Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What is the comparative health status and associated risk factors for the Métis? A population-based study in Manitoba, Canada

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Afsaneh Koochek
26 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Winter
29 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Comparelli
22 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Martens
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Winter
5 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Afsaneh Koochek
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Martens
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-814

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement