Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline Measures by Participant Group

From: Student public commitment in a school-based diabetes prevention project: impact on physical health and health behavior

 

Overall (N = 4603)

Baseline BMI ≥ 85thpercentile (N = 2292)

 

PC (N = 835)

NPC (N = 1472)

Control (N = 2296)

 

PC (N = 392)

NPC (N = 768)

Control (N = 1132)

 
 

Mean (SD) or %

Mean (SD) or %

Mean (SD) or %

p-value

Mean (SD) or %

Mean (SD) or %

Mean (SD) or %

p-value

Student Characteristics

        

   Age in years, M (SD)

11.2 (0.5)

11.3 (0.5)

11.3 (0.5)

0.08

11.2 (0.5)

11.2 (0.5)

11.3 (0.6)

0.14

   % male1

41.4%

50.7%

47.1%

< 0.001

47.2%

52.2%

50.4%

0.24

   Race/Ethnicity

   

0.58

   

0.40

Hispanic

51.0%

57.0%

53.5%

 

53.8%

60.7%

56.7%

 

Black

22.5%

19.1%

15.7%

 

19.9%

17.7%

16.2%

 

White

18.6%

16.2%

21.6%

 

17.9%

14.3%

18.6%

 

Other

7.9%

7.7%

9.2%

 

8.4%

7.3%

8.5%

 

   BMI Percentile, M (SD)

71.5 (28.1)

74.1 (27.5)

72.3 (28.6)

0.08

94.9 (4.1)

95.1 (4.0)

95.1 (4.1)

0.66

   BMI ≥ 95th Percentile

27.8%

31.4%

30.4%

0.20

59.2%

60.2%

61.7%

0.61

   Waist Circumference ≥90th Percentile

28.0%

30.3%

28.6%

0.47

59.3%

57.7%

57.7%

0.92

Family Characteristics

        

   Highest Household Education3

   

0.25

   

0.28

≤ HS Graduate

48.7%

53.6%

51.5%

 

49.1%

56.5%

54.9%

 

≥ Some College

51.3%

46.4%

48.5%

 

51.0%

43.5%

45.1%

 

   Positive Reported Family History of Diabetes

14.5%

11.4%

13.4%

0.08

18.9%

14.2%

17.7%

0.07

Student Health Behaviors

        

   Fruits and Vegetables (servings/day), M (SD)4

2.6 (2.3)

2.7 (2.4)

2.8 (2.6)

0.64

2.6 (2.2)

2.6 (2.3)

2.8 (2.6)

0.37

   Added Sugar Beverages (oz/day), M (SD)4

11.5 (14.4)

11.1 (13.2)

10.8 (12.4)

0.97

10.9 (13.4)

11.1 (13.4)

10.2 (11.9)

0.65

   Fitness (# of laps), M (SD)7,8

22.2 (12.2)

20.4 (11.6)

21.4 (12.3)

0.0043

17.2 (9.8)

16.0 (8.5)

16.1 (8.3)

0.15

  1. PC = group of intervention school students engaged in public commitment activities, NPC = group of intervention students not engaged in public commitment activities
  2. 1 For overall sample, analyses of % male: PC vs. NPC, p = < 0.001; PC vs. Control, p = 0.02; NPC vs. Control, p = 0.09
  3. 2 "Other" race/ethnicity not used in the analysis;
  4. 3 N = 4471 for overall analyses and N = 2236 for BMI ≥ 85th percentile subgroup due to missing data;
  5. 4 N = 3908 for overall analyses and N = 1937 for BMI ≥ 85th percentile subgroup due to missing data; 5adjusted for gender;
  6. 6Square root transformation used for analysis
  7. 7 N = 4157 for overall analyses and N = 2069 for BMI ≥ 85th percentile subgroup due to missing data;
  8. 8 For overall sample, analyses of fitness: PC vs. NPC, p = 0.001; PC vs. Control, p = 1.00; NPC vs. Control, p = 0.377