Skip to main content

Table 2 Responses of post-IEC after fish introductions in villages in Karnataka, India, March to October 2006

From: Comparative efficacy of two poeciliid fish in indoor cement tanks against chikungunya vector Aedes aegyptiin villages in Karnataka, India

Questionnaire

Response

 

Domatmari (n = 50)

Balmanda (n = 50)

p value

1. Have you gained new knowledge through IEC?

Yes - 48 (96%)

No - 2 (4%)

Yes - 47 (94%)

No - 3 (6%)

> 0.001

2. Did you know the cause of the fever outbreak?

a. Chikungunya - 42 (84%)

b. Dengue - 8% (16%)

c. Malaria - 0

d. Brain fever (JE) - 0

a. Chikungunya - 39 (78%)

b. Dengue - 3 (6%)

c. Malaria - 4 (8%)

d. Brain fever (JE) - 2 (4%)

a. > 0.001

b. < 0.01

c. < 0.01

d. < 0.01

3. Which mosquito species was responsible for the fever?

a. Anopheles - 3 (6%)

b. Aedes - 47 (94%)

c. Culex - 0

a. Anopheles - 6 (12%)

b. Aedes - 42 (84%)

c. Culex - 2 (4%)

a. < 0.01

b. > 0.001

c. < 0.01

4. Aedes mosquitoes breed in

a. Clean water - 46 (92%)

b. Polluted water - 4 (8%)

a. Clean water - 39 (78%)

b. Polluted water - 11 (22%)

a. > 0.01

b. < 0.01

5 Did you like the fish-based biocontrol programme?

a. Yes - 44 (88%)

b. No - 6 (12%)

a. Yes - 26 (52%)

b. No - 24 (48%)

a. < 0.001

b. < 0.001

6. What are the drawbacks of such programme?

a. Bad smell - 4 (8%)

b. Fish died - 2 (4%)

a. Bad smell - 34 (72%)

b. Fish died - 31 (62%)

a. < 0.001

b. < 0.001

7. Would you promote such programme?

a. Yes - 50 (100%)

b. No - 0

a. Yes - 32 (64%)

b. No - 18 (36%)

a. < 0.01

b. < 0.001