Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Use and perceived helpfulness of smoking cessation methods: results from a population survey of recent quitters

BMC Public Health201111:592

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-592

Received: 7 March 2011

Accepted: 27 July 2011

Published: 27 July 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
10 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Selby
2 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gregory Connolly
1 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Arthur Hung
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Arthur Hung
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-592

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Monitoring, Evaluation and Research Unit, Cancer Institute NSW
(2)
Cancer Prevention Division, Cancer Institute NSW
(3)
Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney

Advertisement