Skip to main content

Table 4 Association (Odds Ratios, 95% Confidence Intervals) between experienced sexual coercion and sexual behavior in a sample of Ugandan university students.

From: Experience of sexual coercion and risky sexual behavior among Ugandan university students

Sexual behavior

Model 1

Model 2

 

(adjusted for age and educational level of head of household)

(adjusted for age, educational level of head of household, role of religion and trust in others)

 

All

Male

Female

All

Male

Female

Previously had sex

      

Experience of sexual coercion

1.7 (1.2-2.4)

1.7 (1.1-2.6)

1.6 (0.9-3.0)

1.6 (1.1-2.3)

1.6 (1.004-2.5)

1.7 (0.9-3.0)

Minor role of religion

   

1.3 (0.9-1.8)

1.4 (0.9-2.1)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

Low trust in others

   

0.9 (0.6-1.2)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

Low age of sexual debut

      

Experience of sexual coercion

2.5 (1.6-3.9)

2.4 (1.4-4.0)

3.2 (1.4-7.1)

2.4 (1.5-3.7)

2.3 (1.3-3.9)

3.0 (1.3-6.9)

Minor role of religion

   

1.4 (0.9-2.2)

1.4 (0.8-2.2)

1.7 (0.7-3.8)

Low trust in others

   

1.4 (0.9-2.1)

1.1 (0.7-1.9)

2.2 (0.9-5.2)

High number of lifetime sexual partners

      

Experience of sexual coercion

1.9 (1.2-3.0)

2.2 (1.3-3.7)

1.3 (0.5-3.6)

1.9 (1.2-3.0)

2.1 (1.2-3.7)

1.4 (0.5-4.0)

Minor role of religion

   

1.7 (1.1-2.7)

1.4 (0.8-2.4)

3.5 (1.2-10.0)

Low trust in others

   

1.0 (0.6-1.6)

1.01 (0.6-1.7)

0.9 (0.3-2.5)

Inconsistent condom use

      

Experience of sexual coercion

1.0 (0.6-1.7)

1.3 (0.6-2.5)

0.7 (0.3-1.7)

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

1.2 (0.6-2.5)

0.6 (0.2-1.5)

Minor role of religion

   

0.9 (0.5-1.6)

0.7 (0.4-1.4)

1.3 (0.5-3.2)

Low trust in others

   

2.0 (1.1-3.4)

1.3 (0.7-2.7)

3.6 (1.4-9.3)

  1. Results of multivariate logistic regression analyses.