Skip to main content

Table 4 Association (Odds Ratios, 95% Confidence Intervals) between experienced sexual coercion and sexual behavior in a sample of Ugandan university students.

From: Experience of sexual coercion and risky sexual behavior among Ugandan university students

Sexual behavior Model 1 Model 2
  (adjusted for age and educational level of head of household) (adjusted for age, educational level of head of household, role of religion and trust in others)
  All Male Female All Male Female
Previously had sex       
Experience of sexual coercion 1.7 (1.2-2.4) 1.7 (1.1-2.6) 1.6 (0.9-3.0) 1.6 (1.1-2.3) 1.6 (1.004-2.5) 1.7 (0.9-3.0)
Minor role of religion     1.3 (0.9-1.8) 1.4 (0.9-2.1) 1.1 (0.6-2.0)
Low trust in others     0.9 (0.6-1.2) 1.1 (0.6-2.0) 0.5 (0.3-0.9)
Low age of sexual debut       
Experience of sexual coercion 2.5 (1.6-3.9) 2.4 (1.4-4.0) 3.2 (1.4-7.1) 2.4 (1.5-3.7) 2.3 (1.3-3.9) 3.0 (1.3-6.9)
Minor role of religion     1.4 (0.9-2.2) 1.4 (0.8-2.2) 1.7 (0.7-3.8)
Low trust in others     1.4 (0.9-2.1) 1.1 (0.7-1.9) 2.2 (0.9-5.2)
High number of lifetime sexual partners       
Experience of sexual coercion 1.9 (1.2-3.0) 2.2 (1.3-3.7) 1.3 (0.5-3.6) 1.9 (1.2-3.0) 2.1 (1.2-3.7) 1.4 (0.5-4.0)
Minor role of religion     1.7 (1.1-2.7) 1.4 (0.8-2.4) 3.5 (1.2-10.0)
Low trust in others     1.0 (0.6-1.6) 1.01 (0.6-1.7) 0.9 (0.3-2.5)
Inconsistent condom use       
Experience of sexual coercion 1.0 (0.6-1.7) 1.3 (0.6-2.5) 0.7 (0.3-1.7) 0.9 (0.5-1.5) 1.2 (0.6-2.5) 0.6 (0.2-1.5)
Minor role of religion     0.9 (0.5-1.6) 0.7 (0.4-1.4) 1.3 (0.5-3.2)
Low trust in others     2.0 (1.1-3.4) 1.3 (0.7-2.7) 3.6 (1.4-9.3)
  1. Results of multivariate logistic regression analyses.