Skip to main content

Table 2 Sensitivity of continuous weekend-extension strategies to compliance levels

From: Agent-based simulation for weekend-extension strategies to mitigate influenza outbreaks

Effectiveness

R 0 = 1.4

R 0 = 2.0

Compliance

Overall attack rates % (95% CIa)

Relative effectivenessb

Overall attack rates % (95% CI)

Relative effectiveness

Baseline

18.61 (18.54, 18.71)

0.00

26.43 (26.36, 26.53)

0.00

Mon

100%

16.14 (16.03, 16.26)

0.13

25.52 (25.43, 25.62)

0.03

 

90%

16.41 (16.28, 16.54)

0.12

25.58 (25.49, 25.67)

0.03

 

75%

16.83 (16.74, 16.96)

0.10

25.74 (25.67, 25.82)

0.03

 

50%

17.53 (17.39, 17.65)

0.06

26.01 (25.95, 26.09)

0.02

Mon+Tue

100%

11.82 (11.58, 12.11)

0.36

23.84 (23.73, 23.94)

0.10

 

90%

12.98 (12.80, 13.17)

0.30

24.10 (24.00, 24.22)

0.10

 

75%

14.23 (13.93, 14.46)

0.23

24.55 (24.41, 24.96)

0.07

 

50%

15.99 (15.81, 16.22)

0.14

25.28 (25.16, 25.36)

0.04

Mon+Tue

100%

3.26 (1.47, 4.79)

0.82

20.30 (20.16, 20.42)

0.23

+Wed

90%

7.24 (4.87, 8.21)

0.61

21.15 (21.01, 21.34)

0.20

 

75%

10.92 (10.27, 11.37)

0.41

22.31 (22.17, 22.43)

0.16

 

50%

14.45 (14.13, 14.80)

0.22

24.00 (23.81, 24.15)

0.10

  1. a95%CI stands for the 95% confidence intervals from 50 model realizations.
  2. bRelative effectiveness = (Baseline attack rate -Strategy-specific attack rate)/Baseline attack rate.
  3. Table 2 compares the overall attack rates and relative effectiveness resulted from three continuous weekend-extension strategies (Mon, Mon+Tue, and Mon+Tue+Wed). Sensitivity analysis was conducted on each strategy under five compliance levels of 0%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100%.