Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression models for factors related to change in myths about screening mammography (n = 480)*

From: Community-based intervention to promote breast cancer awareness and screening: The Korean experience

 

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals

 

Myth 1

Myth 2

Myth 3

Myth 4

Myth 5

Myth 6

Age (yr) × Time × City

      

30-39

   

1.0

 

1.0

40-49

   

1.67 (0.70-4.00)

 

1.08 (0.33-3.57)

50-59

   

0.34 (0.14-0.84)

 

0.19 (0.05-0.74)

60-69

   

0.50 (0.18-1.45)

 

0.13 (0.03-0.53)

Marital status × Time × City (currently married vs. not currently married)

5.17 (1.20-22.25)

     

Income × Time × City (≥ 20000$ vs. < 20000$)

     

33.39 (4.67-238.45)

Employment × Time × City

     

27.46 (1.97-382.29)

History of mammography × Time × City

 

2.48 (1.32-4.63)

    

TV ads on breast cancer screening × Time × City

   

0.65 (0.52-0.82)

  

Radio ads on breast cancer screening × Time × City

  

0.71 (0.50-1.00)

   

Newspaper article or ad × Time × City

0.63 (0.46-0.88)

    

0.35 (0.18-0.68)

Posters on apartment billboards × Time × City

2.12 (1.47-3.05)

     

Posters in clinic or pharmacy waiting rooms × Time × City

 

1.40 (1.17-1.68)

    

Street promotion × Time × City

  

2.30 (1.53-3.47)

1.59 (1.15-2.20)

 

1.59 (1.03-2.47)

Ad on other websites × Time × City

  

0.48 (0.31-0.72)

   

Physician or pharmacist recommendations × Time × City

  

1.74 (1.29-2.34)

   

Personal stories of cancer patients × Time × City

     

1.78 (1.01-3.16)

Small group education by private hospitals × Time × City

0.64 (0.46-0.89)

    

0.34 (0.20-0.57)

  1. * Only variables that had a time by city interaction term are shown in the table because of the high number of variables involved in the final model.