From: Policy guidance on threats to legislative interventions in public health: a realist synthesis
 |  | Data for non-compliance |  | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Location | Pre legislation % (sampling interval before legislation) | Post legislation % - Time 1 (sampling interval after legislation) | Post legislation % - Time 2 (sampling interval after legislation) | Method used to obtain data |
UK, Birmingham | 1.85 (10 weeks) | 0.97 (10 weeks) | 1.63 (24 months) | Direct observation of usage | |
Walker et al[61]. | UK, London | 2.3 (4 weeks) | 2.6 (4 weeks) | - | Direct observation of usage |
Broughton[62] | UK, London | - | - | 2.6 (36 months) | Direct observation of usage |
Constant et al[63]. | France, nationwide | 4.2 (24 months) | 2.2 (24 months) | - | Self report of usage |
Foss et al[64]. | US, North Carolina | 11.0 (4 to 8 weeks) | 11.8 (20 weeks) | - | Direct observation of usage |
US, New York City | 2.3 (24 weeks) | 1.1 (16 weeks) | 2.1 (12 months) | Direct observation of usage | |
US, Washington DC | 6.1 (12 weeks) | 3.5 (12 weeks) | 4.0 (12 months) | Direct observation of usage | |
Rajalin et al[66]. | Finland, nationwide | 55.8 (no data) | 15.2 (no data) | 20.0 (no data) | Self report of usage |