Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Andy P Dickens
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Andy P Dickens
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rikke Lund
24 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gail Anne Mountain
14 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andy P Dickens
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rikke Lund
22 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andy P Dickens
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
31 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andy P Dickens
Resubmission - Version 7
31 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
8 Apr 2011 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-218

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement