Open Peer Review Reports for: Social capital and life satisfaction: a cross-sectional study on persons with musculoskeletal impairments in Hanoi, Vietnam
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marcel Post |
| 8 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rom Perenboom |
| 30 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Junko Yasuoka |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 30 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marcel Post |
| 15 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rom Perenboom |
| 28 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Junko Yasuoka |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 25 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Junko Yasuoka |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-206 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
