Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Public perceptions and attitudes toward thalassaemia: Influencing factors in a multi-racial population

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - peyman Jafari
20 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manju Mamtani
29 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenny Hewison
4 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nadeem Qureshi
7 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Li Ping Wong
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - peyman Jafari
27 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenny Hewison
20 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Li Ping Wong
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aubrey Sheiham
10 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Li Ping Wong
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Li Ping Wong
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
30 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-193

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement