Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Internet-based Self-Assessment after the Tsunami: lessons learned

  • Stefan Vetter1Email author,
  • Astrid Rossegger2,
  • Thomas Elbert3,
  • Juliane Gerth2,
  • Frank Urbaniok2,
  • Arja Laubacher2,
  • Wulf Rossler4 and
  • Jérôme Endrass2
BMC Public Health201111:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-18

Received: 29 December 2008

Accepted: 7 January 2011

Published: 7 January 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Minna Johanna Anttila
16 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hans van Oers
6 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - peter van der velden
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hans van Oers
8 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - peter van der velden
2 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - peter van der velden
30 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
20 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 8
20 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
28 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 9
28 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
5 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Elbert
Resubmission - Version 11
5 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
7 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
7 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Disaster and Military Psychiatry, University of Zurich
(2)
Psychiatric/Psychological Service, Department of Justice, Canton of Zurich
(3)
University of Konstanz
(4)
Research Unit for Clinical and Social Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich

Advertisement