Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Peterman
28 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Atherton
12 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Frohlich
13 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asad Khan
30 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Walker
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asad Khan
26 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Frohlich
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Walker
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-156

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement