Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Peterman|
|28 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Atherton|
|12 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Frohlich|
|13 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Asad Khan|
|30 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Walker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Asad Khan|
|26 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Frohlich|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Walker|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Mar 2011||Editorially accepted|
|9 Mar 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-156|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.