Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Surveillance of febrile patients in a district and evaluation of their spatiotemporal associations: a pilot study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Hope
21 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Lau
21 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin
26 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Olson
30 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - KW Choi
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin
30 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Hope
1 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Lau
7 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Olson
26 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - KW Choi
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - KW Choi
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-84

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement