Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nan Luo
31 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth MA van Nispen
6 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Garratt
19 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Polinder
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Polinder
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth MA van Nispen
4 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nan Luo
4 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Garratt
13 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Polinder
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Polinder
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
23 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-783

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement