Figure 6From: Cervical cancer screening in Australia: modelled evaluation of the impact of changing the recommended interval from two to three years Sensitivity analysis for incremental numbers of cervical cancer cases diagnosed with 3-yearly screening vs. current practice with a 2-yearly recommendation. Notes: (1) When cytology test characteristics in 2 and 3-yearly screening scenarios were varied, the direction of the incremental effect on 3-yearly screening was different for the two different 3-yearly screening scenarios. (2) Assumptions about early re-screening had effects of opposite directions on the two 3-yearly recommendations.Back to article page