Type D personality is associated with increased metabolic syndrome prevalence and an unhealthy lifestyle in a cross-sectional Dutch community sample

Table 5 Logistic regression of metabolic syndrome

	Step 1				Step 2				Step 3
		95% CI for OR				95% CI for OR				95% CI for OR
	OR	Lower	Upper	Sig.	OR	Lower	Upper	Sig.	OR	Lower	Upper	Sig.
Type D (yes)	2.31	1.32	4.05	.003	2.17	1.19	3.97	.011	2.19	1.20	4.02	.011
Gender (male)	1.16	0.74	1.84	.514	1.02	0.63	1.67	.933	1.03	0.63	1.68	.920
Age < 45 years				.000				.000				.000
45-65 years	12.5	4.94	31.6	.000	9.86	3.85	25.2	.000	9.72	3.79	24.9	.000
>65 years	27.8	10.6	73.1	.000	13.3	4.84	36.5	.000	13.2	4.78	36.3	.000
With partner (yes)	3.58	1.50	8.56	.004	4.36	1.75	10.9	.002	4.24	1.70	10.6	.002
College Education (yes)	0.91	0.54	1.54	.737	0.90	0.52	1.56	.713	0.90	0.52	1.57	.714
CVD (yes)					6.32	3.69	10.8	.000	6.25	3.60	10.8	.000
CVD family history (yes)					1.12	0.69	1.81	.657	1.13	0.69	1.83	.635
Smoking (yes)					0.81	0.44	1.48	.495	0.82	0.45	1.49	.508
Alcohol use > 1 (yes)					0.72	0.41	1.27	.250	0.71	0.40	1.25	.237
Healthy exercise norm (not adhering)									reference			.921
									1.17	0.52	2.65	.705
									0.99	0.57	1.74	.982
Diet guidelines (not adhering)									reference			.729
									0.74	0.34	1.62	.452
									1.00	0.59	1.69	.999
-2LL of the model started at 605.65	570.35				522.53				521.80

ISSN: 1471-2458