Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceptions of personal health risks by medical and non-medical workers in a university medical center: a survey study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Holly Seale
17 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary Patricia Nowalk
6 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tita Alissa Listyowardojo
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Holly Seale
22 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary Patricia Nowalk
28 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tita Alissa Listyowardojo
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tita Alissa Listyowardojo
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tita Alissa Listyowardojo
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
9 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-681

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement