Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The modified NCEP ATP III criteria maybe better than the IDF criteria in diagnosing Metabolic Syndrome among Malays in Kuala Lumpur

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - wanghong xu
11 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roya Kelishadi
5 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - wanghong xu
10 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roya Kelishadi
28 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - FoongMing Moy
Resubmission - Version 8
4 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
6 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-678

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement