Table 4 Direction and magnitude of self-reported outcomes at end of program of any duration (1990-2009)
Author, year and reference # | Improvement in frequency of physical activity/week | Reduction of fat intake Mean reduction in energy % | Increased fibre intake in g/day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | % achieved goal | Mean change | % achieved goal | Mean reduction | % achieved goal | Mean increase |
Whittemore, 2009 [78] | +17% in interv vs. +1% in controls at 6 months | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Bo, 2007 [48] | Â | +4.73 MET-hr intervention vs. in -0.26 MET-hr in controls at 1 yr | Â | -2.64% in intervention vs. -0.02% in controls at 1 yr | Â | +1.7 g/day intervention vs. +0.17 g/d in controls at 1 yr |
Barclay, 2008 [87] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Greaves, 2008 [86] | 37.5% interv vs. 27.5% control | NR | NR | Reported successful reduction of total fat and saturated fat but no data shown | NR | NR |
Kosaka, 2005 [49] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Torgerson, 2004 [80] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Dyson, 1997 [50] | Â | +0.17 L/min VO2max in interv vs. -0.03 L/min in controls at 1 yr | Â | -3.5% in intervention vs. -1.4% in control at 1 yr | Â | +0.9 g/day intervention vs. -0.7 g/day in control at 1 yr |
Eriksson, 1991 [79] | NR | increase of 17% in IGT and 9% Oxigen uptake at 1 yr | NR | NR | NR | NR |
McTigue, 2009 [84] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Pagoto, 2008 [14] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Laatikainen 2007 [83] | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Absetz, 2005 [82] | 66% | NR | 48% | NR | 52% | Â |