This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments
© Bowler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 9 December 2009
Accepted: 4 August 2010
Published: 4 August 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jolanda Maas|
|23 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry Hartig|
|26 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Pullin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry Hartig|
|5 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Pullin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Pullin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|4 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-456|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.