Skip to main content

Table 3 Criteria for a question answerable by public health triangulation

From: Public health triangulation: approach and application to synthesizing data to understand national and local HIV epidemics

Public health importance

Is the question being asked of sufficient public health importance to justify the investment of human resources and funding? [e.g., should a question regarding the impact of rare injection drug use in an African country be pursued or one focused on much more prevalent alcohol use?]

Actionable

Will answering the question being asked lead to the initiation of a public health action? Will the risk factors we identify be modifiable and amendable to public health interventions?

Data availability

Are there data available that have asked the right questions and provide answers on the different steps in the sequence of events that leads to a public health outcome?

Appropriateness

Can the question be answered with conventional research methods or with a single available data set? Is a proposed intervention sufficiently new and unique that it should be evaluated by a different methodology?

Feasibility

Are there sufficient human resources and funding available to gather and analyze the data? Unless sufficient resources are available, searching for data and conducting the multiple levels of analysis needed for triangulation may be inadequate