| | |
WTR if required
|
WTR if asked, but not required
|
---|
| |
%b
|
% Agreec
|
OR (95%CI)d
|
% agree
|
OR (95%CI)
|
---|
By EPPM categories
| | | | | |
EPPM - Threat
|
Low
|
51.2
|
79.0
|
Reference
|
69.9
|
Reference
|
|
High
|
48.8
|
86.8
|
1.58
|
75.2
|
1.23
|
| | | |
(1.25 - 1.98)
| |
(1.02 - 1.49)
|
EPPM - Efficacy
|
Low
|
51.4
|
72.6
|
Reference
|
58.6
|
Reference
|
|
High
|
48.6
|
95.8
|
9.33
|
88.9
|
5.86
|
| | | |
(6.66 - 13.08)
| |
(4.63 - 7.41)
|
EPPM - Combined
|
Low Threat/Low Efficacy
|
30.3
|
69.3
|
Reference
|
57.7
|
Reference
|
|
Low Threat/High Efficacy
|
21.2
|
96.3
|
13.09
|
90.1
|
7.12
|
| | | |
(7.67 - 22.34)
| |
(4.94 - 10.25)
|
|
High Threat/Low Efficacy
|
21.2
|
77.6
|
1.41
|
60.9
|
1.10
|
| | | |
(1.05 - 1.90)
| |
(0.85 - 1.42)
|
|
High Threat/High Efficacy
|
27.3
|
95.6
|
9.25
|
88.6
|
5.52
|
| | | |
(5.94 - 14.40)
| |
(4.03 - 7.56)
|
-
a Extended Parallel Process Model
-
b Percent of respondents included in category
-
c Percent agreeing with WTR statement (positive response)
-
d OR is the odds ratio provided in the logistic regression which compares the odds between a positive WTR response and a negative WTR response with respect to this EPPM category compared to its Reference category, adjusted for key demographic characteristics: gender, age, hours/week worked, highest education level completed and children/marital status.