Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Young women's decisions to accept chlamydia screening: influences of stigma and doctor-patient interactions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Feb 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Natasha Pavlin
18 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Maliski
29 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adina Nack
16 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Myles Balfe
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adina Nack
3 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Maliski
19 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Myles Balfe
19 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Natasha Pavlin
Resubmission - Version 3
19 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Myles Balfe
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-425

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement