Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sexual health of ethnic minority MSM in Britain (MESH project): design and methods

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Elford
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Elford
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
9 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Elford
Resubmission - Version 8
9 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
13 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Elford
Resubmission - Version 10
13 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
14 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
14 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-419

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement