Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of selected studies and AIDS prevalence among men who have sex with men from Brazil, 1998-2009.

From: HIV prevalence among female sex workers, drug users and men who have sex with men in Brazil: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    

Characteristics of Study Population

Sexual behavior and HIV infection

Source

N

State

Design (Period)

Age

Ethnicity (%)

Condom use (%)

HIV prevalence

Variables associated with prevalent HIV

Tun et al. [49]

658

Campinas

Cross-sectional (2006)

Median: 23

NA

Unprotected sex

Overall sample: 7% (5-11%)

NA

      

MSM engaged in sex work:

  
      

   Insertive anal sex: 21.0%

MSM engaged in sex work: 14%

 
      

   Receptive anal sex: 22.0%

  
      

   Vaginal sex: 23.0%

  
      

MSM not engaged in sex work:

MSM not engaged in sex work: 6%

 
      

   Insertive anal sex: 5.0%

  
      

   Receptive anal sex: 5.0%

Participants between 14-19 years: 4%

 
      

   Vaginal sex: 6.0%

  
      

Unprotected receptive anal sex with at least one partner: 30% (CI: 26-35%)

  
      

Unprotected receptive anal sex with ≥ 2 partners: 7% (4-10%)

  
      

Unprotected anal/vaginal sex with female, previous 2 months: 75% (37-91%)

  

Ferreira et al. [50]

1872

Brazil

Cross-sectional (2000-01)

28 ± 8.2

Non white: 51.1%

Always use condom: 36.4%

51.9%

NA

Szwarcwald et al.[51]

8983

Brazil

Cross-sectional (2002)

17-20 years: 94.0%

NA

Always use condom: 34.1%

0.564 (0.278-0.850)

NA

Schechter et al. [52]

200

Rio de Janeiro

Prospective cohort (1998-2001)

28

White: 47.0%

Unprotected anal sex, previous 6 months:

NA5

NA

     

Black: 21.0%

PEP5 : 47.1%

  
     

Mulatto: 7.0%

Non-PEP: 36.4%

  
     

Others: 26.0%

   

Barcellos et al. [53]

4616

Porto Alegre

Cross-sectional (1996)

NA

NA

NA

24.1%

NA

Carneiro et al. [54]

621

Belo Horizonte

Cross-sectional (1994-1999)

Mean: 28

NA

NA

9.8%

Unprotected sex w/occasional partner: AOR7 : = 3.7 (: 1.1 -11.9)

Receptive anal sex w/occasional partner: AOR = 2.8 (0.9- 8.9)

Black vs. Non-black:

AOR = 3.4 (1.3-10.6)

Sutmöller et al.[55]

1165

Rio de Janeiro

Prospective cohort8 (1994-1998)

Range: 18-50

NA

NA

24.1%

NA

Carneiro et al. [56]

470

Belo Horizonte

Cross-sectional (1994-1999)

26.9 ± 6.8

Mulatto: 51.8%

White: 40.9%

Black: 7.3%

Unprotected anal sex with occasional partner: 41.3%9

NA

NA

Brazilian Ministry of Health [57]

642

São Paulo

Cross-sectional (1994-1999)

28

NA

Stable partner

8.8%

NA

      

Receptive anal sex: 33.9%

  
      

Insertive anal sex: 36.0%

  
      

Occasional partner

  
      

Receptive anal sex: 13.7%

  
      

Insertive anal sex: 15.3%

  

Harrison et al. [58]

849

Rio de Janeiro

Prospective cohort10 (1995-97)

HIV+: 28.8

HIV+: 63.6%

Unprotected receptive anal sex:

11.7%

Penile or anal lesion (p < 0.01)

    

HIV-: 28.2

HIV-: 50.7

HIV+: 59.6%

 

Hepatitis B seropositivity (p < 0.01)

      

HIV-: 43.6%

  
      

Unprotected insertive anal sex:

 

History of syphilis (p < 0.01)

      

HIV+: 34.3%

  
      

HIV-: 30.8%

  
  1. 2 All MSM and injection drug users (IDU)
  2. 3 MSM sample size among 30,970 military conscripts
  3. 4 PEP: Post-sexual Exposure Prophylaxis
  4. 5 Only incidence rates are available
  5. 6 Homo and bisexuals included
  6. 7 AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio
  7. 8 Baseline data
  8. 9 Among 265 participants reporting anal sex
  9. 10 Baseline data