Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A newer and broader definition of burnout: Validation of the "Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire (BCSQ-36)"

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Jan de Wilde
26 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gert Jessen
17 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Javier Garcia-Campayo
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gert Jessen
17 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Jan de Wilde
28 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Javier Garcia-Campayo
Resubmission - Version 3
28 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-302

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement