A newer and broader definition of burnout: Validation of the "Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire (BCSQ-36)"
© Montero-Marín and García-Campayo; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 5 February 2010
Accepted: 2 June 2010
Published: 2 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Feb 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erik Jan de Wilde|
|26 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gert Jessen|
|17 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Javier Garcia-Campayo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gert Jessen|
|17 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erik Jan de Wilde|
|28 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Javier Garcia-Campayo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-302|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.