The association between green space and cause-specific mortality in urban New Zealand: an ecological analysis of green space utility
© Richardson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 28 September 2009
Accepted: 11 May 2010
Published: 11 May 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Sep 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeroen Borst|
|4 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jolanda Maas|
|18 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alistair Stewart|
|1 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Mitchell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alistair Stewart|
|23 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeroen Borst|
|1 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jolanda Maas|
|20 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Mitchell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Mitchell|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 May 2010||Editorially accepted|
|11 May 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-240|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.