Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Electronic cigarettes: a survey of users

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karl Fagerstrom
30 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Smith
15 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Francois ETTER
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Francois ETTER
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Smith
17 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Francois ETTER
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Francois ETTER
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Francois ETTER
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
29 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Francois ETTER
Resubmission - Version 8
29 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
4 May 2010 Editorially accepted
4 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-231

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement