Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Analysis of the effectiveness of interventions used during the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ANGELOS HATZAKIS
7 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Rachiotis
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Joel Kelso
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ANGELOS HATZAKIS
11 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Rachiotis
18 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Joel Kelso
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Joel Kelso
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
29 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
29 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-168

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement