Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of latent classes of e-cigarette flavor use

From: Does sensation-seeking behavior influence the patterns of flavored e-cigarette use? A cross-sectional study among Indonesian adolescents and young adults

 

Class 1

Only menthol/mint user

N = 84

Class 2

Mainly fruit

N = 444

Class 3

Multiple flavor users

N = 54

Wald test

(p)

Group comparisonsa

 Age, Mean (SE)

17.74 (0.28)

18.33 (0.10)

17.90 (0.28)

5.21 (.074)

 Sex % Boys

83.5%a

53.4%b

76.3%a

13.07 (< .001)

 Current e-cigarette use

44.6%ab

32.8%a

53.5%b

5.53 (.063)

 Current conventional cigarette use

61.8%a

28.9%b

66.8%a

21.61 (< .001)

 Current dual use

33.3%ab

19.9%a

42.6%b

7.49 (0.024)

 Sensation seeking Mean (SE)

2.77 (0.10)a

2.73 (0.04)a

3.12 (0.10)b

13.53 (< .001)

Multinomial regression modelb

 Age, OR [95% CI]

0.91

[0.77–1.08]

Ref.

0.87

[0.71–1.07]

N/A

 Sex (Ref.: Boys), OR [95% CI]

0.39

[0.11–1.33]

0.55

[0.25–1.21]

 Current e-cigarette use (Ref.: Ever use), OR [95% CI]

0.61

[0.22–1.70]

0.86

[0.34–2.18]

 Current conventional cigarette use (Ref.: No use), OR [95% CI]

3.58*

[1.28–9.97]

4.24**

[1.50–11.94]

 Sensation seeking Mean (SE), OR [95% CI]

1.05

[0.64–1.73]

1.83*

[1.03–3.24]

  1. Note: Proportions or means with different subscripts indicate statistically significant differences at the p < .05 level
  2. OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval, Ref. Reference Group
  3. *: p < .05; **: p < .01
  4. aDCON with continuous variable and DCAT with categorical variables were used
  5. bModel is estimated with R3Step procedure [37]