Strengthening the role of Community Health Representatives in the Navajo Nation
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 June 2016
Accepted: 12 April 2017
Published: 21 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Galvez|
|15 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prabhdeep Kaur|
|20 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline King|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Galvez|
|16 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline King|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Galvez|
|3 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline King|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4263-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.