Skip to main content

Table 4 Cost-effectiveness analysis results over the CRICERVA study for all ages

From: Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in Spain: the CRIVERVA study

Group

Cost

Incremental coverage (%)

ICER(1)

ICER(2)

No intervention (NIG)

86.13€

   

IG1 (letter)

86.62€

17.6%

2.78

2.78 (IG1 vs NIG)

IG2 (letter + leaflet)

87.97€

16.7%

11.02

Dominated (IG2 vs IG1)

IG3 (letter + leaflet + phone call)

89.11€

21.7%

13.73

60.73 (IG3 vs IG1)

  1. (1) Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of each intervention group compared with the no intervention (opportunistic screening) group expressed as € per 1% coverage
  2. (2) Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of one intervention compared with the next least expensive strategy expressed as € per 1% coverage