Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate analysis for different forms of IPV committed by ever married men and their endorsement of attitudes justifying spousal abuse with witnessing father-to mother IPV: 2007 Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (n = 3374)

From: Assessing the link between witnessing inter-parental violence and the perpetration of intimate partner violence in Bangladesh

Measure

Any IPV1

Types of IPV2

Endorsement of attitudes justifying spousal abuse3

RRR (95% CI)§

AOR (95% CI)§

Only physical IPV

Only sexual IPV

Both physical and sexual IPV

AOR (95% CI)¥

Witnessed father-to-mother IPV

 No

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Yes

3.26 (2.61-4.06)a

3.17 (2.53-3.96)a

2.40 (1.04-5.58)c

5.97 (4.05-8.81)a

1.34 (1.08-1.65)b

Interaction of witnessing inter-parental violence AND endorsing attitudes justifying spousal abuse

     

Both witnnessing inter-parental violence and endorsing attitudes justifying spousal abuse

1.00

    

Witnnessing inter-parental violence only

0.41 (0.25-0.65)a

    

Endorsing attiudes justifying spousal abuse only

0.29 (0.19-0.45)a

    

None

0.13 (0.08-0.19)a

    
  1. Note: 1,2,3 Models were adjusted for age, education, place of residence, religion, wealth index category, earning provide family basic needs, any living children, number of family members, decision making autonomy, ever use of drug or alcohol, and marital duration
  2. §Adjusted for endorsement of attitudes justifying spousal abuse3
  3. ¥Adjusted for any IPV
  4. AOR adjusted odds ratio, RRR relative risk ratio, CI confidence interval, IPV intimate partner violence
  5. a p < 0.001, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.05