Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics and comparison of farmers’ markets (n = 7) and roadside produce stands (n = 8) in northeastern North Carolina

From: A possible dose–response association between distance to farmers’ markets and roadside produce stands, frequency of shopping, fruit and vegetable consumption, and body mass index among customers in the Southern United States

Number and percentage of farmers’ markets with the following characteristics

Number

Percentage

Forms of Payment

 Accepts cash

15

100

 Accepts credit/debit

7

47

 Accepts Check

11

73

 Accepts WIC

0

0

 Accepts SNAP/EBT

3

20

 Has a farmers’ market sign

13

87

 Has a welcome booth

9

60

Number and percentage with the following fruits and vegetables (Audits conducted July–September 2015)

Number

Percentage

 Apples

11

73

 Blueberries

8

53

 Cantaloupe

11

73

 Peaches

14

93

 Strawberries

3

20

 Broccoli

2

13

 Cabbage

6

40

 Cauliflower

0

0

 Corn

9

60

 Cucumbers

13

87

 Kale

5

33

 Lettuce

5

33

 Onions

12

80

 Peppers

11

73

 Squash

15

100

 Tomatoes

14

93

 Watermelon

13

87

Comparison of farmers’ markets and roadside produce stands

Mean

P-value

Total amenities score

 

0.2766

Farmers’ markets

20.1

 

Produce stands

14.5

 

Fruit and vegetable availability

 

0.2827

Farmers’ markets

15.4

 

Produce stands

10.6

 
 

Percentage

P-value

Farmers’ market or produce stand sign

 

1.0000

Farmers’ markets

85.7

 

Produce stands

87.5

 

SNAP/EBT available

 

0.0769

Farmers’ markets

42.8

 

Produce stands

0.0