Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

A randomized-controlled trial focusing on socio-economic status for promoting vegetable intake among adults using a web-based nutrition intervention programme: study protocol

BMC Public Health volume 17, Article number: 74 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Web-based nutritional education programmes appear to be comparable to those delivered face-to-face. However, no existing web-based nutrition education or similar programme has yet been evaluated with consideration of socio-economic status. The objective of a nutritional education programme of promoting vegetable intake designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the results of intervention and to determine how socio-economic status influences the programme effects.

Methods/Design

Participants will be randomly sampled individuals (aged 30–59) stratified according national population statistics for sex, age, and household income. Participants were consented to survey participation (n = 1500), and will be randomly divided into intervention and control groups. The intervention period is 5 weeks with one step of diet-related education per week. The main outcome of the programme is dietary behaviour as eating vegetable (350 g per day, five small bowl). To encourage behavioural changes, the programme contents are prepared using behavioural theories and techniques tailored to the assumed group stages of behavioural change. In the first step, we employ the health belief model to encourage a shift from the pre-contemplative to the contemplative phase; in the second and third steps, social cognitive theory is used to encourage transition to the preparatory phase; in the fourth step, social cognitive theory and strengthening social support are used to promote progression to the execution phase; finally, in the fifth step, strengthening social capital and social support are used to promote the shift to the maintenance phase. The baseline, post intervention and follow-up survey was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. For process evaluation, we use five items relating to programme participation and satisfaction. A follow-up survey of participants will be carried out 3 months after intervention completion.

Discussion

The fact that this study is an RCT with an established control group is a strong advantage. Information and communications technology is not limited by time or place. If we could show this web-based nutrition education programmes has a positive effect, it may be an appropriate tool for reaching individuals in lower socio-economic state.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials UMIN-ICDR UMIN 000019376 (Registered October 16, 2015).

Peer Review reports

Background

Appropriate vegetable intake appears to be effective for cancer prevention [1, 2] and is associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular disease [3, 4], obesity [5], and other lifestyle-related diseases. Health policy initiatives are promoting vegetable intake across all segments of the population worldwide. However, in practice, it has been widely reported that vegetable intake remains low among social disadvantaged groups in terms of household income and other indicators of socio-economic status [6, 7].

As part of efforts to promote vegetable intake among adults, several nutrition education programmes that have incorporated aspects of behavioural science theory have proven effective [8–10]. Web-based intervention programmes are of particular note, and several have been developed and verified outside of Japan [10–20]. Lauren et al. [17] compared the effects of face-to-face nutrition education with a web-based education, and found that changes in vegetable intake prompted by the web-based programmes were comparable with those achieved through the face-to-face programmes. Additionally, Bensley et al. [16] reported that provision of information through bulletins board increased vegetable intake by 0.2 serving while a web-based intervention increased intake by 0.6 serving.

Despite these promising findings, only the reports by Buller and Ball [13, 19] considered socio-economic status in relation to web-based nutrition education programmes, indicating an extreme paucity of research in this area. Buller et al. demonstrated that it is possible to implement web-based nutrition education programmes even in agricultural communities lacking an adequate web infrastructure. Of course, a remaining challenge is that their findings are limited to agricultural communities. There are no studies comparing the effects of different socioeconomic status.

In Japan, the recommended daily amount of vegetables is 350 g, from the perspective of preventing lifestyle-related diseases [21]. Nevertheless, approximately two-thirds of adults do not meet this recommendation [22] – in particular, the average daily vegetable intake for adults is around 70 g below the recommended amount. The average daily intake among lower-income social groups is a further 70 g lower than that among higher-income groups. Our nationwide survey of adults on the actual situation regarding the relationship between socio-economic status and dietary habits showed that, lower-income groups are less likely to have a habit of eating five servings of vegetables daily than are higher-income groups [23]. However, even among higher-income groups, the proportion of individuals who customarily consume five servings of vegetables daily is extremely small, at approximately 10% of the population [24]. Thus, support for the increased intake of appropriate vegetables should be implemented using a population-based approach that targets not only lower-income groups, but also the entire adult population. We hypothesize that achieving an approximately 70 g (1 serving) increase in vegetable intake might help lower-income groups to catch up while simultaneously contributing to the partial resolution of the deficient vegetable intake amongst Japan’s adult population.

In Japan, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications report on Internet usage by Japanese citizens [25] shows that, today, the proportion of Internet users among all Japanese aged 30–59 is 90% or more. Furthermore, the proportion of lower-income individuals (i.e., who are earning less than two million JPY per annum; approx. 15,800 GBP) is 61%, and rising annually. A relatively high proportion of respondents to this report indicated that they use the Internet to search for information about health and medicine, ranging from 73% among 30-year-olds to 80% among 59-year-olds. The proportion of respondents who reported using the Internet at least once a week was as high as 91%. Thus, as a form of information and communications technology (ICT), the Internet is a powerful health education tool for which future expansion can be anticipated in fields of health promotion, especially nutrition [26]. Web-based nutrition education programmes by their nature rely on ICT and the Internet in particular [27]. However, in the context of web-based support for increased vegetable intake, there are almost no reports, even at the worldwide level, verifying the effects of these programmes according to income level.

In this paper, we describe the methods and protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that seeks to verify the effectiveness of a web-based nutrition education programme of promoting vegetable intake among adults and that is based on behavioural science theory. The main objective of the RCT is to develop and verify the effects of a 5-week programme of promoting vegetable intake. A secondary objective is to determine how the effects of this web-based nutrition education programme differ according to socio-economic status.

Methods

Study design

This study describes a two-armed, matched-design, web-based RCT. The nutrition education programme that we have developed as part of a health promotion project (Fig. 1). The intervention period is 5 weeks. The RCT is designed in line with the CONSORT statement for randomised trials of non-pharmacologic treatment [28]. Participants were assessed at three points in time: at baseline (T1), at post intervention (5 weeks later; T2), and at a follow-up at 3 months (T3). The participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the intervention group and the waiting list group (i.e., the control group).

Ethics approval

The RCT was conducted according to guidelines laid out in the Declaration of Helsinki for procedures involving human subjects, and has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Research with Human Subjects of Waseda University, Japan (2015-167). The respondent's privacy and personal information are fully protected due to agreement between the registration monitor and the social research company used to recruit participants. All e-mails were sent to participants by the research service company, and we have received a database containing only non-specific, anonymized data.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart showing participant recruitment, randomization, and evaluation of the Diet and Exercise Practices Project study

Full size image

Study sample

Recruitment source and procedure

A web-based intervention survey was conducted by a Japanese online research service company that contains data, including sociodemographic attributes, for approximately 160,300 adults aged 30–59 years. Participants were randomly selected based on Japanese population statistics for the present study. We targeted adults because of the necessity of health promotion, healthy eating, and reduction in health disparities for this age group [23]. The following inclusion criteria are considered: (1) men and women aged 30–59 years old; (2) able to understand Japanese; (3) can access the Internet at home, work, or a public place; (4) agree to access the study website during the 5-week intervention period; (5) will participate in all three assessment points during the 4-month study period. The exclusion criterion is having an household income of ten million yen or more (meaning that 88.4% of the total population is having an household income of ten million yen less) [29]. The study procedure from enrolment to follow up is depicted in Fig. 1.

The research company that we used in the present study periodically analyses and updates its registrant database. A notable characteristic of this company is that, to prevent bias among survey respondents, the firm requests the participation of the minimum number of respondents after taking response rate into consideration. Moreover, once every 6 months, the firm updates its monitoring information and conducts checks to safeguard against double registration or non-existent IP addresses. Registrants had been enrolled with the survey company by an open recruitment process.

Study participants were recruited using the following procedure. Of the approximately 160,300 registered monitors (as of September 2015), participants randomly to match the sex, age [30], and household income [29] distributions of Japan. Only study participants received an e-mail containing the website URL and password. Participate in the study were randomly assigned it to two groups in the order that received an answer to the intervention or control groups by the online research service company. The web-based nutrition educational programme is available in HTML format. Respondents who completed the questionnaire and clicked the ‘send’ button at the end of the online informed consent form were considered to have consented to survey participation (n = 1500). The research service company offered reward points valued at 40 JPY (in October 2015, one USD was equivalent to approximately 121 JPY) at T1. Of these, individuals who were allocated to the intervention group were offered reward points valued at 300 JPY after completion of the intervention (T2). Respondents from the control group were offered reward points valued at 40 JPY at T2. The participants were again offered reward points valued at 40 JPY for completing the assessment at 3 months after the completion intervention (T3; i.e. 4 months after the completion of the baseline survey [T1]).

Setting

Regarding the setting, at baseline (T1), individuals consenting to participate in the study were randomly assigned it to two groups in the order that received an answer to the intervention or control groups by the online research service company. The researchers were not involved in this allocation in any way. All participants received a notification e-mail informing them of their allocated groups. The groups were listed as P Group (intervention group) and Q Group (control group) to prevent participants from knowing which group they were assigned to. This study is signal a type of single blinding. Because it is not the intervention of face to face, there is no contact during the intervention period.

Intervention group

Participants assigned to the intervention group received an e-mail containing the dates of programme updates, the website URL of the intervention programme, a password for browsing the website, and the following information.

The programme updates were sent on Monday morning of each week during the intervention period. Participants received a total of five e-mails on the nutrition education programme over the 5 weeks of the intervention period. On the first occasion, participants received an e-mail containing (1) instructions on how to access the website (i.e. the URL and password), (2) an overview of the programme and how it would proceed, and (3) the programme contents for the first week. The e-mails sent in the subsequent weeks, in addition to item (1–3), included (4) a review of the contents of the previous step. The programme website was made freely accessible only for the duration of the intervention period, and after which it was closed. Participants’ passwords were effective for the duration of the study. If a participant forgot his or her password, it could be retrieved by contacting a research officer. After completion of the 5-week intervention, participants received an e-mailed request to participate in the post-intervention survey (T2). Finally, participants received another e-mail request to participate in a follow-up survey 3 months after completing the intervention (T3).

Control group

The control group surveys took place over the same period as intervention group surveys. Control group participants received an advance notification e-mail after the baseline from the survey company that another survey would take place 5 weeks later. After a 5-week-long silence, participants received an e-mail request to take part in the post-intervention survey (T2). Subsequently, participants received an e-mail request to participate in a follow-up survey 3 months later (T3).

Intervention programme

An interactive webpage called the ‘Diet and Exercise Practices Project (http://healthpromotionqol.com)’ is designed to improve vegetable intake of visitors to help decrease the likelihood of lifestyle-related diseases (Fig. 2). It is a free website that provides information, a monitoring sheet, and advice about healthy diets, increasing vegetable intake, and preventing lifestyle-related diseases. We hypothesize that achieving an approximately 70 g (1 serving) increase in vegetable intake might help lower-income groups to catch up while simultaneously contributing to the partial resolution of the deficient vegetable intake amongst Japan’s adult population. Therefore, the action goals of intervention is a vegetable dish to eat five servings, or was a plus 1 serving (approximately 70 g) per day. The programme is divided into five steps that align with the stages of behaviour change. Table 1 shows the framework of the programme. To be updated every week, but watch the past step not proceed in the previous step. It was created to advance the based on behavioural science theory. To avoid contamination during the intervention period, access to the webpage was password-restricted so that only study participants could visit it.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A snapshot of the website

Full size image
Table. 1 Five steps and accompanying components of the dietary education intervention
Full size table

In order to achieve this action goals were designed following the intervention programme. To encourage behavioural changes, the programme contents are prepared using behavioural theories and techniques tailored to the individual stages of behavioural change. In the first step, we employ the health belief model to encourage a shift from the pre-contemplative to the contemplative phase; in the second and third steps, social cognitive theory is used to encourage transition to the preparatory phase; in the fourth step, social cognitive theory and strengthening social support are used to promote progression to the execution phase; finally, in the fifth step, strengthening social capital and social support are used to promote the shift to the maintenance phase. All of the steps is composed of four items, as introducing “Today's point (Including review of the previous week from the second week onwards)”, information and skills necessary to behaviour modification as practical content “Do you know?” and “Easy in devising” are on two page, as summary “Let's try it !(to support behaviour change by using a work sheet)”.

Web design

The website design was settled on through consultations with registered dieticians, health movement educator, and public health experts. Regarding the size of the online text, the amount of information, and the configuration of the website, we obtained the advice of web design professionals. Figures 2 and 3 show a snapshot on programme of the website, while the website structure is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A snapshot on programme page of the website

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Website structure

Full size image

Assessment

The primary outcome variable was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire in Japanese. Regarding the assessment, at baseline (T1), primary outcomes, transtheoretical model [31], self-efficacy [32], dietary knowledge [33], perceptions of neighborhood food environments within secondary outcomes, and all other measurements. After completion of the 5-week intervention, participants received an e-mailed request to participate in the post-intervention survey (T2). At post-intervention survey (T2), we assessed the all primary outcomes, all secondary outcomes, all other measurements excluding the subjective economic status. We evaluated about the participants’ satisfaction of process evaluation as after intervention. Finally, participants received another e-mail request to participate in a follow-up survey 3 months after completing the intervention (T3). At follow-up survey (T3), we assessed the all primary outcomes, all secondary outcomes, and all other measurements excluding the subjective economic status.

Primary outcomes

As Health Japan 21 (the secondterm), it is necessary to evaluate the intervention that applies to the improvement of diet-related quality of life. Interventions that focus on dietary lifestyle require evaluation of diet-related quality of life as primary outcomes. Two of the subscales of the Subjective Diet-Related quality of life scale includes dietary satisfaction and fun of meals. As primary outcomes, we considered Subjective Diet-Related quality of life, which comprised an assessment of the final dieting goal (2 items) [34], and self rated health, which has been reported to be associated with both socio-economic status and mortality [35, 36].

Secondary outcomes

The secondary outcomes were eating behaviours, which was considered an index of behavioural change and is often held up as the goal of nutrition education. Three eating behaviours (per week) were considered: mealtime balance, or eating ‘balanced meals comprising a staple food, a main dish, and a side dish’ [37], ‘eating dark green vegetables’, and ‘eating full servings of vegetables (5 small dishes or approx. 350 g per diem)’ [38]. The mealtime balance behaviour has been shown to facilitate nutrient intake and improve nutritional status [39–41]. To explain the staple foods, main dishes, side dishes, and vegetable servings, we posted sample photographs for reference in terms of size and amount, and stipulated that respondents should always check these photographs before responding. Because daily eating behaviours (two items) were checked using these photographs depicting single (70 g) servings of vegetables, participants were also asked to answer how many vegetable servings they consumed per diem. This item reflects the fact that, as demonstrated by Ozawa et al. [42], the behavioural goal of ‘five or six small [vegetable] dishes a day’ can potentially serve as an easily grasped indicator of consuming 350 g per diem. Additionally, the amount of vegetables eaten each day (in g) was also self-reported.

Other measurements

As our intention was to evaluate not only outcomes, but also the processes leading to behavioural change, we also employed secondary items assessing diet. We used a measure based on the transtheoretical model [31] (containing three items) to evaluate the intermediate factors relating to secondary-outcome eating behaviours, and a measure of self-efficacy [32] (also containing three items) as an evaluation of preparatory factors. We also used two items [33] to assess dietary knowledge concerning secondary-outcome eating behaviours. Perceptions of neighborhood food environments relating to eating behaviour was assessed with ten items [43, 44].

We also measured health literacy [45], which is defined as the knowledge, desire, and skills for acquiring, comprehending, evaluating, and making use of health information, using a scale with good validity for the Japanese population. In the context of our previous research, the relationship of health literacy with vegetable intake behaviour was shown to be unaffected by socio-economic status, whereas promotion of vegetable intake behaviour has the potential to improve health literacy [46]. In addition, we measured subjective economic status [47], household income [30], educational attainment [23, 24, 46], and other attributes (namely sex, age, marital status, living status, and employment status).

Process evaluation

Adherence to the intervention was assessed by the number of log-ins and duration spent in the website. Furthermore, the participants’ satisfaction with the intervention was assessed by using a self-administered questionnaire at post-intervention. With reference to previous studies on programme development [48, 49], we also included an evaluation (5 items) of the nutrition education programme itself. The items were as follows: (1) was the content of the programme fun? (2) was the content of the programme easy to understand? (3) after participating, did you become aware of any problems in your own diet? (4) did you feel the programme was helpful as a health management material? and (5) as a health management material, did it make you want to participate again another time?

Sample size

The sample size was calculated using G*Power [50]. We set an effect size of 0.5, an α of 0.05, and a power of 0.95. With the expectation that two-thirds of participants would drop out, the size of the intervention group was set at 900 subjects, while that of the control group was set at 600 subjects with the expectation that a half of participants would drop out. Furthermore, we aimed to divide the intervention and control groups further according to income (low and high).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses will be performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0. For continuous variables, independent t-tests will be used to determine inter-group differences and Man–Whitney U-tests for intra-group comparison, while the χ2 or an equivalent test is to be used to determine the associations between categorical variables. Because this is a prospective RCT involving repeated measures, repeated measures analyses of variance will be applied to determine significant differences within the study groups. We also considered the possible effect of time on groups. The evaluation of the intervention is based on an intention-to-treat analysis. A p-value of 0.05 has been set as the level of significance.

Discussion

This study describes an RCT of a web-based nutrition education programme. Promoting vegetable intake is an important challenge for health promotion during adulthood, regardless of socio-economic status. Japanese adults of all household income levels consume less than approximately two-thirds of the recommended daily amount (i.e. 350 g or five servings per day). Support for the increased intake of appropriate vegetables seems best implemented using a population-based approach, as this issue is necessary for not only lower-income groups, but also the entire adult population. Web-based nutrition education programmes are communication tools that use ICT, in particular the Internet. In other words, it is a health education tool for which future expansion can be anticipated in fields of health promotion. If we could show that such web-based nutrition education programmes are beneficial for improving vegetable intake, our population-based approach would enable lower-income groups to catch up in terms of averaged daily intake of vegetables while also contributing to the resolution of the overall deficiency in vegetable intake in Japan’s overall adult population. So far as we know, this is the first report regarding a web-based nutrition education programme developed with a focus on socio-economic status.

Strengths and limitations

This study has three main strengths. First, this is an RCT using high-quality research methods. Because the RCT participants were assigned randomly, there is very little allocation bias. Additionally, randomization took place after acquiring consent to participate, which means that the intervention group was not populated only with participants actively interested in the research topic. This helps in avoiding over-estimation of the effects of the nutrition education programme in the intervention group. Second, this is nutrition education programme was web-based, thus making it highly accessible. Furthermore, the study was carried out by a social research company with a wealth of experience in implementing academic research surveys. These points ensured high feasibility while minimizing the burden of securing an adequate sample size to increase statistical power. In addition, participants could be extracted to match the distribution of sex and age in the Basic Resident Register and household income in the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. For this reason, possible confounding effects could for the most part be eliminated at the stage of allocation. Third, the programme affords numerous advantages for both participants and supporters. Participants can take part when they are free to do so (e.g. time, place, and scheduling). As this means that they can take part even if they are located far away from the researchers, it would be highly convenient for participants [26]. The programme also offers supporters the opportunity to provide a unified nutrition education programme that is not reliant on the number of participants and to provide support without being subject to spatial or geographical restrictions. While it is true that the initial cost is somewhat considerable, its operational costs are low. The economic burden on supporters is thus small. Furthermore, passwords can be set for browsing the nutrition education programme, which can prevent communication between groups that could impact the quality of research.

The RCT in this study is original in the following two regards. (1) It can verify the intervention effect for an adequate sample size, and (2) it can verify differences in the effect of a nutrition education programme by income strata. With this study, it will also be possible to verify the possible catch-up effect in relation to undesirable vegetable intake behaviour associated with low household income. Some reports have suggested that traditional classroom-based nutrition interventions might widen this disparity [6]. In contrast, with our study, it may be possible to show that a web-based nutrition education programme would inhibit the widening of this disparity.

Conversely, this study also has its limitations. It is possible that the results of the study will reflect the characteristics of individuals registered with the research company (e.g., tending to be young, high-earning, and highly educated [51–53]). To minimize this potential limitation, we have made sure to match participants with demographic distributions in terms of sex, age, and household income. In addition, we requested research cooperation from individuals whose household income data – which was our objective – had been recorded in advance. This helps to restrict attribute bias as well as negative response rates for delicate questions pertaining to household income and other matters. Second, during participant recruitment, we excluded individuals reporting household incomes of ten million JPY or more. This means that the results do not target the entire population. Accordingly, care must be taken when drawing general conclusions. However, a limit of less than ten million JPY still applies to 88.4% of the Japanese population. Finally, participants did not have contact with one another (either in person or through indirect communication) for the period of the intervention. For this reason, it is possible that rates of adherence to nutrition education programmes will be lower than they would with enforced participation.

Implications for practice

The promotion of vegetable intake behaviour is an important challenge for health promotion during adulthood, regardless of socio-economic status. ‘Health Japan 21 (the second term)’ policy initiative [21] is promoting the use of ICT as a health promotion strategy for the future. Because ICT frees individuals from the limitations of time or place, it may be a tool that encompasses individuals in lower socio-economic strata who have little time to spare. If we can show that web-based nutrition education programmes have a positive effect, our study would represent the outcome of a population approach as a health promotion strategy.

Abbreviations

ICT:

Information and communications technology

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

References

  1. Harnack L, Nicodemus K, Jacobs Jr DR, Folsom AR. An evaluation of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans in relation to cancer occurrence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:889–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Takachi R, Inoue M, Ishihara J, Kurahashi N, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of total cancer and cardiovascular disease: Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazzano LA, Serdula MK, Liu S. Dietary intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2003;5:492–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillman MW, Cupples LA, Gagnon D, Posner BM, Ellison RC, Castelli WP, et al. Protective effect of fruits and vegetables on development of stroke in men. JAMA. 1995;273:1113–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mozaffarian DD, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett W, Hu FB. Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2392–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oldroyd J, Burns C, Lucas P, Haikerwal A, Waters E. The effectiveness of nutrition interventions on dietary outcomes by relative social disadvantage: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(7):573–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McGill R, Anwar E, Orton L, Bromley H, Lloyd-Williams F, O'Flaherty M. Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M. Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. J Nutr. 2005;135(10):2486–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomson CA, Ravia J. A systematic review of behavioral interventions to promote intake of fruit and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(10):1523–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Appleton KM, Hemingway A, Saulais L, Dinnella C, Monteleone E, Depezay L, et al. Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55(3):869–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L. Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(6):647–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park A, Nitzke S, Kritsch K, Kattelmann K, White A, Boeckner L, et al. Internet-based interventions have potential to affect short-term mediators and indicators of dietary behavior of young adults. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40(5):288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buller DB, Woodall WG, Zimmerman DE, Slater MD, Heimendinger J, Waters E, et al. Randomized trial on the 5 a day, the Rio Grande Way Website, a web-based program to improve fruit and vegetable intake in rural communities. J Health Commun. 2008;13(3):230–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sternfeld B, Block C, Quesenberry Jr CP, Block TJ, Husson G, Norris JC, et al. Improving diet and physical activity with ALIVE: a worksite randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(6):475–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander GL, McClure JB, Calvi JH, Divine GW, Stopponi MA, Rolnick SJ, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(2):319–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bensley RJ, Anderson JV, Brusk JJ, Mercer N, Rivas J. Impact of internet vs traditional special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children nutrition education on fruit and vegetable intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(5):749–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neuenschwander LM, Abbott A, Mobley AR. Comparison of a web-based vs in-person nutrition education program for low-income adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(1):120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O'Donnell S, Greene GW, Blissmer B. The effect of goal setting on fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity level in a Web-based intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(6):570–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ball K, McNaughton SA, Le HN, Abbott G, Stephens LD, Crawford DA. ShopSmart 4 Health: results of a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(2):436–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elgán TH, Kartengren N, Strandberg AK, Ingemarson M, Hansson H, Zetterlind U, et al. A web-based group course intervention for 15–25-year-olds whose parents have substance use problems or mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Health Japan 21 (the second term). Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo. 2013. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10900000-Kenkoukyoku/0000047330.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  22. The National Health and Nutrition Survey 2014. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo. 2015. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/04-Houdouhappyou-10904750-Kenkoukyoku-Gantaisakukenkouzoushinka/0000117311.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  23. Nakamura S, Inayama T, Hata K, Matsushita M, Takahashi M, Harada K, et al. Association of household income and education with eating behaviors in Japanese adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakamura S, Inayama T, Arao T. Association of vegetable consumption with eating behaviors in Japanese adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Jpn J Health Educ Promot. 2016;24:65–80. In Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Information and Communications in Japan: Popularization of the Internet. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Tokyo. 2015. http://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/eng/WP2015/2015-index.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  26. Neuhauser L, Kreps GL. Rethinking communication in the e-health era. J Health Psychol. 2003;8(1):7–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Comprehensive survey of living conditions 2012. (2012). http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa12/dl/03.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  30. Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. The 2013 population census of Japan. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Tokyo. 2013. http://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_news/s-news/01gyosei02_02000055.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  31. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health. Tokyo Metropolitan Health Promotion Plan 21 (second): Awareness and activities survey on ties with health and local residents. http://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.jp/kensui/plan21/chousa.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  34. Ainuki T, Akamatsu R, Hayashi F, Takemi Y. The reliability and validity of the Subjective Diet-related Quality of Life (SDQOL) Scale among Japanese adults. Jpn J Nutr Diet. 2012;70:181–7. In Japanese.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Okado J, Bin A, Tomoyama G, Hoshi T. A follow-up study on the relationship between subjective health and mortality among the elderly people. Jpn J Health Educ Promot. 2003;11:31–8. In Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kondo N, Sembajwe G, Kawachi I, van Dam RM, Subramanian SV, Yamagata Z. Income inequality, mortality, and self rated health: meta-analysis of multilevel studies. BMJ. 2009;339:b4471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Koyama T, Yoshita K, Sakurai M, Miura K, Naruse Y, Okuda N, et al. Relationship of consumption of meals including grain, fish and meat, and vegetable dishes to the prevention of nutrient deficiency: the INTERMAP Toyama study. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2016;62(2):101–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The national health and nutrition survey 2009. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo. 2012. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/dl/h21-houkoku-01.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  39. Adachi M. A study on the core-dishes and these combination as a framework of nutrition education on the basis of dish-selecting method. Jpn J Health Hum Ecol. 1984;50(2):70–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Harigai Y. Study on the development of meal-planning skills of one meal unit based on the dish-selecting method of nutritional education. Jpn J Nutr Diet. 2003;61(6):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shimada M, Kobayashi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Okada K, Murayama N, Sasaki S, et al. Improvement of food choices among sixth-grade elementary school children before and after the nutrition education program using a buffet-style school lunch with the “the Lunch Box Diet Method.”. Jpn J Health Educ Promot. 2008;16:94–109. In Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ozawa K, Takemi Y, Eto K, Tanaka H, Fujii H, Ishikawa M, et al. Stage of vegetable intake and self-reported number of vegetable dishes consumed: Are they valid measures of vegetable intake among middle-aged adults? Jpn J Nutr Diet. 2013;71(6):97–111. In Japanese.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shimomitsu K. Project on evaluation about the food environment: study on the environment and the evaluation method of the environmental conditions to support health promotion. Comprehensive Research on Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases and Other Lifestyle Related Diseases. Tokyo: Research Report of Health Labour Sciences Research Grant; 2011. http://www.tmu-ph.ac/pdf/120723_01.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  44. Shimomitsu K. Project on the development and goal setting of the food environment: study on the effective environmental implement of health promotion supported environment and setting of the policy objective. Comprehensive Research on Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases and Other Lifestyle Related Diseases. Tokyo: Research Report of Health Labour Sciences Research Grant; 2008. http://www.tmu-ph.ac/pdf/090716_06.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  45. Ishikawa H, Nomura K, Sato M, Yano E. Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: a pilot study of Japanese office workers. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(3):269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nakamura S, Inayama T, Hata K, Katsushita M, Takahashi M, Harada K, et al. Association between health literacy and eating vegetables and socioeconomic status in adults. Jpn Soc Health Promot. 2016;18(2):27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Murayama N. Substantial study on socioeconomic factors to prescribe the content of the Japanese eating habits. Research Report of Health Labour Sciences Research Grant: Tokyo; 2014. In Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shimpo M, Akamatsu R, Yamamoto K, Tamaura Y, Takemi Y. Development of an educational material called ‘best adviser for diet’ for weight control and its evaluations by healthcare professionals. Jpn J Nutr Diet. 2012;70(4):244–52. In Japanese.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sawada K, Takemi Y, Murayama N, Sasaki S, Ishida H. Development and evaluation of a worksite-based nutrition education program integrated with food environmental intervention applying the Transtheoretical Model. Jpn J Health Educ Promot. 2009;17(2):54–70. in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J. Using the internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4, e13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Rhodes SD, Bowie DA, Hergenrather KC. Collecting behavioural data using the World Wide Web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:68–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yasunaga H, Ide H, Imamura T, Ohe K. Medical research using internet questionnaire in Japan. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2006;53:40–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participating agencies and the professionals who participate as officials, and residents in this study.

Funding

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP25560357) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16J02348).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

SN designed the study, analysed the data, and drafted the article. TI and TA provided advice about the study design, supervised, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human participants and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Research with Human Subjects of Waseda University, Japan (2015-167). Respondents who completed the questionnaire and clicked the ‘send’ button at the end of the online informed consent form were considered to have consented to survey participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minami-Osawa 1-1, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan

    Saki Nakamura & Takayo Inayama

  2. Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Kojimachi Business Center Building, 5-3-1, Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan

    Saki Nakamura

  3. Faculty of Sports Sciences, Waseda University, Mikajima 2-579-15, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan

    Takashi Arao

Authors
  1. Saki Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takayo Inayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takashi Arao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayo Inayama.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamura, S., Inayama, T. & Arao, T. A randomized-controlled trial focusing on socio-economic status for promoting vegetable intake among adults using a web-based nutrition intervention programme: study protocol. BMC Public Health 17, 74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3907-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3907-y

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us