Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of the study sample

From: Job strain and resting heart rate: a cross-sectional study in a Swedish random working sample

 

All

Men

Women

p-value*

Total, n (%)a

1552

752 (48.5)

800 (51.5)

 

-Job strain ratio >1, n (%)b

621 (40.0)

246 (32.7)

375 (46.9)

<0.01

-Job strain ratio ≤1, n (%)b

931 (60.0)

506 (67.3)

425 (53.1)

Mean age

46.0

46.6

45.4

0.02

Age, range (median)

24–71 (46)

24–71 (47)

25–68 (45)

 

Mean heart rate (SD)

61.0 (9.9)

59.4 (10.0)

62.4 (9.5)

<0.01

Heart rate, range (median)

35–109 (60)

35–109 (59)

39–101 (62)

 

Mean diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

81.3

82.5

80.2

<0.01

Mean systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

126.6

130.5

122.9

<0.01

Mean BMI (kg/m2)

25.5

26.2

24.8

<0.01

BMI, n (%)b

   

<0.01**

-Underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2)

8 (0.5)

0 (0)

8 (1.0)

 

-Normal weight (18.5 ≤BMI <25 kg/m2)

769 (49.5)

300 (39.9)

469 (58.6)

 

-Overweight (25 ≤BMI <30 kg/m2)

602 (38.8)

355 (47.2)

247 (30.9)

 

-Obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2)

173 (11.1)

97 (12.9)

76 (9.5)

 

Waist measure, mean (cm)

86.5

92.9

80.2

<0.01

Current smokers, %

260 (16.9)

95 (12.8)

165 (20.7)

<0.01

Leisure time physical activity, n (%)b

   

<0.01

-Sedentary leisure time

147 (9.5)

86 (11.5)

61 (7.6)

 

-Moderate exercise during leisure time

889 (57.4)

409 (54.5)

480 (60.1)

 

-Regular exercise and training

468 (30.2)

225 (30.0)

243 (30.4)

 

-Hard exercise or competitive sports

45 (2.9)

30 (4.0)

15 (1.9)

 

Education, n (%)b

   

<0.01

-Compulsory school

193 (12.5)

119 (15.8)

74 (9.3)

 

-Lower secondary school

336 (21.7)

165 (21.9)

171 (21.5)

 

-Upper secondary school

424 (27.4)

219 (29.1)

205 (25.7)

 

-University education

596 (38.5)

249 (33.1)

347 (43.5)

 
  1. aRow percentage
  2. bColumn percentage
  3. *Presented for significant differences between men and women. T-test was used for continuous variables and chi2 for categorical variables
  4. **Fisher’s exact test was used since the number of underweight subjects in one of the categories were less than 5, rendering the chi2-test potentially invalid