Skip to main content

Table 2 Chance of return to work according to participation in psychoeducation

From: Effectiveness of psychoeducation in reducing sickness absence and improving mental health in individuals at risk of having a mental disorder: a randomised controlled trial

 

Control group n = 200

Intervention group

Intervention group

Intention-to-treat n = 200

Per-protocol n = 132

Full RTWa

   

 3 mo

28 (22;35)

19 (14;25)

11 (5;16)

  CIP % (95 % CI)

1 (ref)

0.68 (0.47;0.98)

0.38 (0.22;0.65)

  RR (95 % CI)

   

 6 mo

45 (38;52)

44 (37;51)

40 (31;48)

  CIP % (95 % CI)

1 (ref)

0.97 (0.78;1.21)

0.89 (0.68;1.15)

  RR (95 % CI)

   

First RTWb

   

 3 mo

38 (31;44)

31 (25;38)

26 (19;34)

  CIP % (95 % CI)

1 (ref)

0.83 (0.63;1.09)

0.69 (0.49;0.97)

  RR (95 % CI)

   

 6 mo

52 (45;59)

49 (42;56)

46 (38;55)

  CIP % (95 % CI)

1 (ref)

0.94 (0.77;1.14)

0.88 (0.70;1.11)

  RR (95 % CI)

   
  1. CIP (Cumulative Incidence Proportion) shows the percentages of individuals having returned to work
  2. aCompeting risk: death or other benefits such as early retirement or supported job
  3. bCompeting risk: death or other benefits (except supported job)