Skip to main content

Table 1 Category, surveillance field and objective(s) of the approaches used for the evaluation of surveillance systems

From: Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches

References

Approach category

Surveillance field

Main objective

Objective(s) of the evaluation as stated in the document

Case study application

 

Author’s definition

Reviewed definition*

[5]

Framework

Framework Guidelines Method

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To assess the quality of the information provided; the effectiveness in supporting the objective(s), in supporting informed decision-making; and the efficiency of SS

-

[18]

Tool

Method Tool

PHa

Design efficient surveillance systems

Help plan, organize, implement SS

Not described

[19]

Tool

Guidelines Method Tool

PHa

Design efficient surveillance systems

To establish a baseline and to monitor progress

-

[20]

Guidelines

Framework Guidelines Method

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To establish and maintain effective and efficient surveillance and response systems

-

[21]

Framework

Guidelines

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To assess existing SS and identify areas which can be improved

-

[22]

Framework

Framework

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To evaluate whether SS attain their objectives, and to provide information for further development and improvement

Military surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks on duty areas

[23]

Framework

Frameworl

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To provide objective, valid and reliable information for the decisions on which surveillance activities and functions should be continued

-

[24]

Framework

Framework Guidelines

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To establish the relative value of different approaches and to provide information needed to improve their efficacy

-

[25]

Tool

Framework Guidelines

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To assess whether the surveillance method appropriately addresses the disease/health issues; whether the technical performance is adequate

-

[26]

Guidelines

Framework Guidelines

PHa

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To define how well the system operates to meet its objective(s) and purpose

-

[27]

Tool

Method Tool

AHb

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To propose recommendation for improvement of SS

Implemented in France: surveillance network for antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic bacteria from animal origin (also mentioned but not described: early detection of FMD; case detection of rabies in bats; poultry disease surveillance network and salmonella laboratory surveillance network)

[28]

Framework

Framework Guidelines Method

AHb

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

Support the detection of disparities in surveillance and support decisions on refining SS design

Implemented in UK: demonstration of freedom from Brucella melitensis; early detection of CSF and case detection of Tb.

[29,32]

Method

Guidelines Method

AHb

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

To contribute to the improvement of the management of epidemiological animal health SS

Implemented in France: evolution of mycoplasmosis and salmonellosis rates in poultry (RENESA network); and the FMD surveillance network in cattle

[30]

Framework

Framework

EHc

Evaluate performance and effectiveness

Make evidence-based decisions regarding the future selection, development and use of data

Environmental public health surveillance programs

[31]

Method

Guidelines Method

PHa & AHb

Evaluate the completeness of the surveillance systems in terms of core components

Evaluate the completeness and coherence of the concepts underlying a health surveillance program

National Integrated Enteric Pathogen Surveillance Program, Canada

  1. a: Public Health; b: Animal Health; c: Environmental Health; SS: Surveillance System. FMD: Foot and Mouth Disease *According to the information provided in the publication.