From: Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches
References | Approach category | Surveillance field | Main objective | Objective(s) of the evaluation as stated in the document | Case study application | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author’s definition | Reviewed definition* | |||||
[5] | Framework | Framework Guidelines Method | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To assess the quality of the information provided; the effectiveness in supporting the objective(s), in supporting informed decision-making; and the efficiency of SS | - |
[18] | Tool | Method Tool | PHa | Design efficient surveillance systems | Help plan, organize, implement SS | Not described |
[19] | Tool | Guidelines Method Tool | PHa | Design efficient surveillance systems | To establish a baseline and to monitor progress | - |
[20] | Guidelines | Framework Guidelines Method | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To establish and maintain effective and efficient surveillance and response systems | - |
[21] | Framework | Guidelines | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To assess existing SS and identify areas which can be improved | - |
[22] | Framework | Framework | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To evaluate whether SS attain their objectives, and to provide information for further development and improvement | Military surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks on duty areas |
[23] | Framework | Frameworl | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To provide objective, valid and reliable information for the decisions on which surveillance activities and functions should be continued | - |
[24] | Framework | Framework Guidelines | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To establish the relative value of different approaches and to provide information needed to improve their efficacy | - |
[25] | Tool | Framework Guidelines | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To assess whether the surveillance method appropriately addresses the disease/health issues; whether the technical performance is adequate | - |
[26] | Guidelines | Framework Guidelines | PHa | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To define how well the system operates to meet its objective(s) and purpose | - |
[27] | Tool | Method Tool | AHb | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To propose recommendation for improvement of SS | Implemented in France: surveillance network for antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic bacteria from animal origin (also mentioned but not described: early detection of FMD; case detection of rabies in bats; poultry disease surveillance network and salmonella laboratory surveillance network) |
[28] | Framework | Framework Guidelines Method | AHb | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | Support the detection of disparities in surveillance and support decisions on refining SS design | Implemented in UK: demonstration of freedom from Brucella melitensis; early detection of CSF and case detection of Tb. |
Method | Guidelines Method | AHb | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | To contribute to the improvement of the management of epidemiological animal health SS | Implemented in France: evolution of mycoplasmosis and salmonellosis rates in poultry (RENESA network); and the FMD surveillance network in cattle | |
[30] | Framework | Framework | EHc | Evaluate performance and effectiveness | Make evidence-based decisions regarding the future selection, development and use of data | Environmental public health surveillance programs |
[31] | Method | Guidelines Method | PHa & AHb | Evaluate the completeness of the surveillance systems in terms of core components | Evaluate the completeness and coherence of the concepts underlying a health surveillance program | National Integrated Enteric Pathogen Surveillance Program, Canada |