Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Assessing care providers’ perceptions and beliefs about physical activity in infants and toddlers: baseline findings from the Baby NAP SACC study

BMC Public Health volume 15, Article number: 100 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

As children now spend increasing amounts of time in out-of-home care, care providers play an important role in promoting positive health behaviors. Little is currently known about providers’ perceptions and beliefs about physical activity, particularly for very young children. This study describes providers’ perceptions and beliefs about infants’ and toddlers’ physical activity, and assesses their knowledge of physical activity guidelines, to establish if and where providers may need support to promote physical activity in child care settings.

Methods

We analyzed baseline data from a pilot randomized-controlled trial conducted in 32 child care centers in Massachusetts, USA. Providers completed physical activity-related questionnaires from which we compared twenty perception and belief questions for infant and toddler care providers.

Results

203 care providers (96% female, mean ± SD age: 32.7 ± 11.2 years) from 29 centers completed questionnaires. A large proportion of providers (n = 114 (61.9%)) believed that infants should be active for 45 minutes or less each day, and only 56 providers (29.7%) perceived toddlers to require more than 90 minutes of activity per day. 97% of providers perceived it was their job to ensure children engaged in a healthy amount of physical activity and most (94.1%) perceived physical activity to be important to own their health, despite 13.3% finding it hard to find the energy to be physically active.

Conclusions

This study is the first to assess the physical activity perceptions and attitudes of providers caring for infants and toddlers. Though all providers believed toddlers should engage in more physical activity than infants, most providers believed that young children require only a short amount of physical activity each day, below recommended guidelines. How provider perceptions influence children’s physical activity behavior requires investigation.

Peer Review reports

Background

The early years represent a period of rapid growth and development [1] and are important for the initiation and development of positive health behaviors. Relatively little is known about how physical activity influences very young children’s health, yet emerging evidence suggests that even in the youngest age groups, physical activity is beneficial to children’s health and development [2].

Despite these potential benefits, physical activity guidelines for children under the age of 6 years have until recently been lacking [3]. In 2009, the National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) revised their recommendations [4,5] to provide physical activity guidelines for infants, toddlers, and preschool-aged children. These stated that infants should interact with caregivers in daily physical activities dedicated to exploring movement and the environment, be in environments to encourage and stimulate movement and active play for short periods of time several times a day, and have opportunities for structured and unstructured physical activity [4]. They also recommended toddlers engage in at least 30 minutes of structured and at least 60 minutes (but up to several hours) of unstructured physical activity per day [4].

Subsequent physical activity guidelines for children under 6 years have been released in Australia [6], the UK [7] and Canada [8]. In the US, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has now specified four recommendations to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary time in infants, toddlers and pre-schoolers [1], with a particular focus on the child care environment. These guidelines encourage sufficient opportunities for children to be active throughout the day, an appropriate environment for physical activity, free from obstruction, and training for care providers providing advice to parents about increasing physical activity and decreasing sedentary time [1]. Additionally, the IOM recommended 15 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for every hour in care [1].

Such recommendations are increasingly important, as many young children now spend the majority of their waking hours in out-of-home care [9]. In 2010, 35.3% of infants and 37.5% of toddlers with working mothers in the US were cared for by someone other than a relative [10], with the majority of these children being cared for in child care centers. These centers therefore serve as an important outlet for children’s physical activity [11], yet children appear to engage in little moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) whilst in child care [12]. In general, young children appear to be sedentary for large proportions of time [13-15], and spend increasingly large amounts of time in screen-based activities [16], from a very young age [17]. Encouraging higher physical activity levels in the youngest age groups in these settings may therefore be beneficial for children’s development [1], and long-term health [2].

To date, the majority of research in the child care environment has focused on children older than 2 years, with little data available for infants and toddlers. Although average physical activity levels vary significantly between centers in preschool-aged children [18,19], they are likely to be more active in centers where greater opportunities to be active, both indoors and outdoors, are provided [20,21]. In one study, 2 and 3-year-olds with more opportunities to be active engaged in higher levels of physical activity [22]. Given the crucial role centers play in meeting children’s physical activity needs, they are a plausible and potentially successful intervention setting [23-25]. Interventions in older preschool children developed to increase physical activity by providing additional time [26], equipment [27] and provider training [28-30] have showed positive results, as has one providing training for care providers of toddlers and infants [31].

Despite promising intervention efforts, few have sought to harness the large influence that care providers have on children’s activity levels. As care providers may both encourage and discourage physical activity in preschool-aged children, consciously or otherwise [25], their perceptions, beliefs and own physical activity behaviors may be an important influence [32]. However, little is known about what factors might influence activity behavior in very young children, despite the developmental importance of physical activity in infants and toddlers [6-8] and the increasing amount of time they spend in child care [9]. Given the role of care providers in promoting physical activity in young children, and that strategies to promote physical activity are likely to differ depending on children’s age, this study assessed physical activity perceptions and beliefs of infant and toddler child care providers.

Methods

Participants and study design

We used baseline data collected in spring 2009 from a pilot randomized controlled trial intervention called the Baby Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (Baby NAP SACC). Full details of the study are presented elsewhere [33]. Briefly, the intervention aimed to help prevent obesity in children under the age of 2 years by improving policies and care provider practices related to nutrition and physical activity in child care centers. The 6-month-long intervention took place in a sample of 32 licensed centers (16 intervention, 16 control) serving racially and ethnically diverse children under the age of 2 years in the greater Boston, Massachusetts (MA) area [33]. Informed written consent was obtained from each center director prior to study onset, and the study was approved by the Human Subjects Committee of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.

Assessing provider physical activity perceptions and beliefs

All staff members, including directors and teachers (“providers”) involved in the care of infants and toddlers at the 32 study centers were asked to complete up to 3 self-administered written questionnaires.

All providers were first asked to complete a brief measure assessing their physical activity perceptions. Prior to study initiation, no instruments were available to assess provider perceptions of young children’s physical activity. These measures were therefore developed for the Baby NAP SACC study, tested with a small sample of providers, (n=2) to ensure face validity, and revised based on provider feedback.

We used providers’ responses to 12 statements (e.g. “Part of my job is making sure children get a healthy amount of physical activity”, see Table 1 for all 12 statements) to assess their perceptions about their role in supporting physical activity in young children (9 questions), and their own physical activity (3 questions) [34]. Statements relating to providers’ own physical activity were adapted from a questionnaire designed to assess physical activity, and barriers and facilitators to physical activity in adults [34]. Providers rated their agreement with each statement on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). We then dichotomized these responses to determine whether providers agreed (strongly agree/agree) or did not (had no view/strongly/disagreed) with each statement.

Table 1 Infant and toddler providers’ perceptions and beliefs about physical activity (derived from Baby NAPSACC questionnaires 1,2 )
Full size table

We used 2 questions, again developed for the Baby NAP SACC study, to assess provider knowledge of the daily activity recommendations for infants and toddlers. Providers were asked “How many minutes of physical activity should infants 0-12 months of age get each day?” and “How many minutes of physical activity should toddlers 12-24 months of age get each day?” Providers chose one of 8 categories (0 minutes; 1-15; 16-30; 31-45; 46-60; 61-90; 91-120; 120-150 minutes) in response to each question.

Providers were also asked to complete a questionnaire related to their beliefs about physical activity for infants, toddler, or both, depending on their assigned classroom in the center. These questions were based on an instrument available and in use at the time of the Baby NAP SACC study [35] to assess parental beliefs about physical activity. We used the version of the instrument that included questions related to both infant and toddler physical activity and feeding behavior, although the final questionnaire focused solely on feeding behaviors [35]. As these questionnaires were originally designed to assess parental beliefs and behaviors, we adapted the wording for some questions to be used with care providers. For example, we changed “your child” to “the children in your care”, “infants” or “toddlers” where relevant. We used 8 statements (which were identical save for the word ‘infant’ or ‘toddler’) to assess provider beliefs about physical activity in young children (e.g. “Being physically active as an infant/toddler can help prevent too much weight gain”, see Table 1 for all 8 statements). Providers responded to each statement on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Disagree; 3 = Neutral, 5 = Agree), and we dichotomized their responses to determine whether providers agreed (4/5) or did not (1-3) with each statement. These measures had acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.69 for infant questionnaire and 0.77 for the toddler questionnaire).

All care providers reported their age, sex, role within the center, education level, and race and ethnicity. Care providers stated how long they had worked in child care in general. Center directors were also asked to provide basic center demographic information, including the number of years the center had been in operation; the number of children enrolled; the number of care providers in the center; participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP); and National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) accreditation.

Analysis

Data were analyzed using STATA/IC 12. Basic descriptive statistics were calculated for providers participating in the study and for the centers from which they were recruited. Missing data accounted for fewer than 3% of observations, with only provider age (13%) and time spent at current center (10%) missing in ≥10% of participants.

We calculated the percentage of providers agreeing with each of the 20 statements relating to their perceptions of supporting physical activity in young children, their own physical activity and their beliefs about physical activity in young children. We also generated descriptive data about provider perceptions of the recommended levels of physical activity for infants and toddlers. To explore differences in infant/ toddler provider beliefs about physical activity, we compared provider responses by type (infant/toddler) using χ2 tests. A significance level of α = 0.05 was set a priori.

Results

Baseline data were available from 29 child care centers (Intervention: n = 14; Control n = 15), as 3 centers withdrew from the study prior to completing the measures. Of the 203 child care providers who participated, 191 were female (96%), with a mean age (SD) was 32.9 (11.1) years. Centers from which these participants were drawn had been in operation for a median (Interquartile range) of 13 (10-18.2) years, had 63 (35-111) children enrolled, with 13 (10-24) care providers per center. 21 centers (72.4%) participated in CACFP and 16 centers (55.2%) were accredited by the NAEYC.

The majority of providers perceived they had a role in supporting physical activity in young children (Table 1), although 22.8% of providers believed they had limited responsibility to promote physical activity in young children. Most providers (94.1%) perceived physical activity to be important to their health, despite 13.3% finding it hard to find the energy to be physically active. Just under three quarters of providers (72.1%) believed that physical activity could prevent too much weight gain in infants and toddlers; toddler providers were more likely to believe this than infant providers (80.2 vs. 56.4%, Chi2p < 0.001). Compared to infant providers, toddler providers were more likely to believe that toddlers should learn to be still in public places at an early age (24.5 vs. 9.1%, Chi2p = 0.01).

The amount of activity providers perceived infants and toddlers to require each day is shown in Table 2. A large proportion of providers (n = 114 (61.9%)) believed that infants should be active for 45 minutes or less each day, and only 56 providers (29.7%) perceived toddlers to require more than 90 minutes of activity per day. All care providers believed that toddlers should engage in more activity each day than infants.

Table 2 Provider-perceived daily activity requirements for infants and toddlers
Full size table

Discussion

This study is the first to assess the physical activity perceptions and attitudes of providers caring for infants and toddlers. Providers, regardless of whether they cared for infants or toddlers, were positive about their role in supporting physical activity. Just under a quarter did however believe they had limited responsibility to promote physical activity in young children, and over 10% of providers found it hard to work up the energy for their own physical activity. A majority of providers believed that infants required less than one hour of physical activity each day, and less than 45% of providers correctly stated that infants should be active for at least 90 minutes per day (the physical activity guidelines in use at the time of data collection [4]). All providers believed toddlers required more physical activity than infants. Ensuring providers are aware of and encourage children to achieve the recommended daily amounts of physical activity [1,36] may be important to support and promote health and development of very young children [2].

Providers were generally positive about their role in supporting physical activity, with many agreeing with statements relating to their influence on children’s activity (e.g. when I make an effort to encourage children to be active, they get a lot of physical activity; I can get most children to be active during outdoor play and physical activities). These results fit with previous qualitative and quantitative literature conducted in preschool-aged children, which suggests that providers act as ‘gate-keepers’ [37], both facilitating [37-39] and impeding children’s physical activity when in care [37,40]. Moreover, providers’ own behaviors have been shown to influence physical activity levels in preschoolers previously [25]. Given that a number of providers reported finding it hard to find the energy for their own physical activity here [25,37], more work is required to establish how providers’ own activity behaviors are associated with those of the young children in their care.

Almost a quarter of providers (22.8%) perceived they had limited responsibility to promote physical activity in young children. This may be due to providers’ perceptions that young children naturally engage in high levels of activity [41,42] and do not therefore require encouragement. With many competing demands on providers’ time, they may also choose not prioritize physical activity, particularly when faced with the need to ensure children are meeting cognitive milestones [11]. The social expectation that toddlers should sit still was also apparent here. As seen in parents [43] and providers [42] caring for preschool-aged children previously, these findings highlight for the first time in younger children the tension between the expectation that children should be ‘well behaved’ and the need for sufficient physical activity.

In order to promote physical activity in young children, it is important that providers are aware of the amount of physical activity infants and toddlers require. Here, most providers believed less than one hour of physical activity per day was sufficient for infants, and fewer than half of providers correctly stated that toddlers should be active for at least 90 minutes on average per day (the NASPE physical activity recommendations in place at the time of data collection in 2009 [4]). More recent activity guidelines for children under 6 years, issued in Australia [6], the UK [7] and Canada [8], advocate 3 hours of activity during waking hours for children who are able to walk, with specification of age-appropriate guidelines such as encouraging tummy time for non-walkers [6-8]. The US Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggests young children engage in 15 minutes of activity in every waking hour in care [1], which also equates to approximately 2 hours of activity over an 8-hour day in care. Though evidence to support these guidelines, particularly with regards to intensity of activity [44], is currently sparse [6], the field is moving towards a consensus with regards activity requirements in young children. Simple interventions to boost providers’ knowledge, confidence and ability to provide sufficient active opportunities [33] whilst children are in care are therefore likely to be beneficial for infants and toddlers [2].

As children spend increasingly large periods of time in child care [9], they and their parents rely on providers to allow for sufficient opportunities to be active [11,41]. Most providers believed that it was important for children to be physically active from an early age, and for infants and toddlers to learn new physical skills. Work should now determine whether these perceptions influence physical activity levels and developmental outcomes of children in their care. Moreover, establishing how providers’ own behaviors are associated with children’s in-care physical activity would be beneficial, to determine if using providers as positive role models may enhance interventions to increase physical activity in child care settings.

Strengths and limitations

This study was conducted in a racially and ethnically diverse sample, using existing questionnaires to assess care providers perceptions and beliefs. Despite the majority of providers being white females, there was a range of educational attainment across providers, which is likely to reflect the profession as a whole. Providers had varied experience both within their current center and in child care more generally. Although it would have been interesting to assess clustering of provider responses within centers, this was not possible due to the small numbers of providers in some centers (Range: 1-20).

It is possible that asking providers about their perceptions and beliefs about physical activity may have introduced a social desirability bias, particularly in light of the wider aims of Baby NAP SACC to improve the nutrition and physical activity environments of child care centers. Although perceptions and beliefs were assessed at baseline before the intervention had taken place, the majority of providers tended to agree with more socially desirable responses, and disagree with less socially desirable ones. The questions relating to children’s physical activity requirements are however less likely to be influenced by social desirability, as there was not an obvious “correct” answer. Therefore, responses may be seen as more of a true representation of provider knowledge. This paper provides a baseline indication of infant and toddler providers’ views about physical activity. Unfortunately, objective measurement of physical activity was not undertaken in this study, as it would have been preferable to assess providers’ own physical activity behaviors and children’s physical activity levels within centers to determine how these relate to provider perceptions and beliefs. In addition, as participants were drawn from a small region within one state, further work is needed to assess how perceptions vary both within and across states, and between countries.

Conclusions

Despite care providers’ perceptions that they play a role in supporting young children’s physical activity, many believe young children require less activity than is currently recommended. As increasing numbers of children spend their waking hours in child care, providers may be important in influencing children’s activity behavior. Future work should determine what influence providers’ beliefs and perceptions, and their own physical activity, have on young children’s physical activity behavior. This is necessary to determine whether harnessing the large potential influence of child care providers may enhance interventions to promote physical activity in very young children.

Abbreviations

Baby NAP SACC:

Baby Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-assessment for Child Care

US:

United States

NASPE:

National Association for Sport and Physical Education

UK:

United Kingdom

IOM:

Institute of Medicine

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Policies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Timmons BW, Leblanc AG, Carson V, Connor Gorber S, Dillman C, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0-4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:773–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pate RR, O’Neill JR. Physical activity guidelines for young children: an emerging consensus. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:1095–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Active Start: A Statement of Physical Activity Guidelines for Children Birth to Five Years. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: NASPE; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Active Start: A Statement of Physical Activity Guidelines for Children Birth to Five Years. Reston, VA: NASPE; 2002. p. 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Health and Aging. Get Up and Grow: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity for Early Childhood. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Health. Start Active, Stay Active: A Report on Physical Activity from the Four Home Countries’ Chief Medical Officers. London, UK: Department of Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tremblay MS, Leblanc AG, Carson V, Choquette L, Connor Gorber S, Dillman C, et al. Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines for the Early Years (aged 0-4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:345–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Washington, D.C., USA: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics.

  10. Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: 2011 – Detailed Tables [http://www.census.gov/hhes/childcare/data/sipp/2011/tables.html]

  11. Copeland KA, Sherman SN, Kendeigh CA, Kalkwarf HJ, Saelens BE. Societal Values and Policies May Curtail Preschool Children’s Physical Activity in Child Care Centers. Pediatrics. 2012;129:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reilly JJ. Low levels of objectively measured physical activity in preschoolers in child care. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2010;42:502–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinkley T, Salmon J, Okely AD, Crawford D, Hesketh K. Preschoolers’ physical activity, screen time, and compliance with recommendations. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012;44:458–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vale S, Silva P, Santos R, Soares-Miranda L, Mota J. Compliance with physical activity guidelines in preschool children. J Sports Sci. 2010;28:603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wijtzes AI, Kooijman MN, Kiefte-de Jong JC, de Vries SI, Henrichs J, Jansen W, et al. Correlates of Physical Activity in 2-Year-Old Toddlers: The Generation R Study. J Pediatr. 2013;163(3):791–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Christakis DA, Garrison MM. Preschool-aged children’s television viewing in child care settings. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1627–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Christakis DA. The effects of infant media usage: what do we know and what should we learn? Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:8–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pate RR, Pfeiffer KA, Trost SG, Ziegler P, Dowda M. Physical activity among children attending preschools. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1258–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pate R, McIver K, Dowda M, Brown W, Addy C. Directly Observed Activity Levels in Preschool Children. J Sch Health. 2008;78:438–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bower JK, Hales DP, Tate DF, Rubin DA, Benjamin SE, Ward DS. The Childcare Environment and Children’s Physical Activity. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dowda M, Pate RR, Trost SG, Almeida MJ, Sirard JR. Influences of preschool policies and practices on children’s physical activity. J Community Health. 2004;29:183–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gubbels JS, Kremers SP, van Kann DH, Stafleu A, Candel MJ, Dagnelie PC, et al. Interaction between physical environment, social environment, and child characteristics in determining physical activity at child care. Heal Psychol. 2011;30:84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward DS, Vaughn A, McWilliams C, Hales D. Interventions for increasing physical activity at child care. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2010;42:526–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Trost SG, Ward DS, Senso M. Effects of child care policy and environment on physical activity. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2010;42:520–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Larson N, Ward DS, Neelon SB, Story M. What role can child-care settings play in obesity prevention? A review of the evidence and call for research efforts. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:1343–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Specker B, Binkley T, Fahrenwald N. Increased periosteal circumference remains present 12 months after an exercise intervention in preschool children. Bone. 2004;35:1383–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hannon JC, Brown BB. Increasing preschoolers’ physical activity intensities: an activity-friendly preschool playground intervention. Prev Med (Baltim). 2008;46:532–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eliakim A, Nemet D, Balakirski Y, Epstein Y. The effects of nutritional-physical activity school-based intervention on fatness and fitness in preschool children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007;20:711–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Trost SG, Tang R, Loprinzi PD. Feasibility and efficacy of a church-based intervention to promote physical activity in children. J Phys Act Heal. 2009;6:741–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ward DS, Benjamin SE, Ammerman AS, Ball SC, Neelon BH, Bangdiwala SI. Nutrition and physical activity in child care: results from an environmental intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:352–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Benjamin Neelon S, Taveras E, Østbye T, Gillman M. Preventing obesity in infants and toddlers in child care: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Matern Child Health J. 2013; [Epub].

  32. Cardon G, Labarque V, Smits D, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Promoting physical activity at the pre-school playground: the effects of providing markings and play equipment. Prev Med (Baltim). 2009;48:335–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Benjamin Neelon SE, Taveras EM, Ostbye T, Gillman MW. Preventing obesity in infants and toddlers in child care: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:1246–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Donahue KE, Mielenz TJ, Callahan LF, Sloane PD, Devellis RF. Identifying Supports and Barriers to Physical Activity in Patients at Risk for Diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3:A119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson AL, Mendez MA, Borja JB, Adair LS, Zimmer CR, Bentley ME. Development and validation of the Infant Feeding Style Questionnaire. Appetite. 2009;53:210–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. American Academy of Pediatrics. Caring for Our Children: National Health and Safety Performance Standards; Guidelines for Early Care and Education Programs. Aurora, CO, USA: National Resource Center for Health and Safety in Child Care and Early Education; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Copeland KA, Kendeigh CA, Saelens BE, Kalkwarf HJ, Sherman SN. Physical activity in child-care centers: do teachers hold the key to the playground ? Health Educ Res. 2011;27:81–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pagnini D, Wilkenfeld R, King L, Booth M, Booth S. Early childhood sector staff perceptions of child overweight and obesity: the Weight of Opinion Study. Heal Promot J Aust. 2007;18:149–54.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Zandvoort M, Tucker P, Irwin JD, Burke SM. Physical activity at daycare: issues, challenges and perspectives. Early Years. 2010;30:175–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown WH, Pfeiffer KA, McIver KL, Dowda M, Addy CL, Pate RR. Social and environmental factors associated with preschoolers’ nonsedentary physical activity. Child Dev. 2009;80:45–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hesketh KD, Hinkley T, Campbell KJ. Children’s physical activity and screen time: qualitative comparison of views of parents of infants and preschool children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. De Craemer M, De Decker E, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Vereecken C, Duvinage K, et al. Physical activity and beverage consumption in preschoolers: focus groups with parents and teachers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:278.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodríguez-Oliveros G, Haines J, Ortega-Altamirano D, Power E, Taveras EM, González-Unzaga MA, et al. Obesity determinants in Mexican preschool children: parental perceptions and practices related to feeding and physical activity. Arch Med Res. 2011;42:532–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hesketh K, McMinn A, Ekelund U, Sharp S, Collings P, Harvey N, et al. Objectively measured physical activity in four-year-old British children: A cross-sectional analysis of activity patterns segmented across the day. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Arielle Traub and Lauren Bradley for their assistance with data collection. The Baby NAPSACC study is registered in the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register: ISRCTN33733318, and was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant F32DK80618. The work of KH was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [Grant Number ES/I901922/1]; RB was supported by an NIH Doctoral Training Grant in Cancer Epidemiology: T32 CA 0900 at the Harvard School of Public Health. The work of KH and SBN was supported by the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, and Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged (CEDAR grant number: RES-590-28-0002). EvS is support by the Medical Research Council [Unit Programme number MC_UU_12015/7].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Kathryn R Hesketh, Esther MF van Sluijs & Sara E Benjamin Neelon

  2. UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N1EH, UK

    Kathryn R Hesketh

  3. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Rachel E Blaine

  4. Division of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Population Health Management, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA

    Elsie M Taveras

  5. Obesity Prevention Program, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA

    Matthew W Gillman

  6. Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center and Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA

    Sara E Benjamin Neelon

Authors
  1. Kathryn R Hesketh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esther MF van Sluijs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rachel E Blaine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elsie M Taveras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthew W Gillman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sara E Benjamin Neelon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn R Hesketh.

Additional information

Competing interests

In relation to the submitted work, KH received a travel grant from the Economic and Social Research Council. SBN was in receipt of a NIH F32 grant, received a consulting fee from Nemours Children’s Health System, and received travel support from the New York and Arizona Departments of Public Health. SBN was also paid for consultancy work by the Nemours Children’s Health System external to this work. Also external to this work, MG received royalties from Cambridge University Press for co-editing a book on Maternal Obesity and from UpToDate for authoring a chapter on dietary fat. EvS, RB, ET report no conflicts of interests.

Authors’ contributions

SBN conceived of the Baby NAP SACC study. KH conducted the data analyses and drafted the manuscript, interpreting the results under the supervision of SBN and EvS. SBN analyzed the data, and assisted with the development of the research question and manuscript. MG and ET helped oversee the implementation of the intervention, and along with RB, reviewed and helped interpret the data. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hesketh, K.R., van Sluijs, E.M., Blaine, R.E. et al. Assessing care providers’ perceptions and beliefs about physical activity in infants and toddlers: baseline findings from the Baby NAP SACC study. BMC Public Health 15, 100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1477-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1477-z

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us