Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Exploring the nature of stigmatising beliefs about depression and help-seeking: Implications for reducing stigma

  • Lisa J Barney1Email author,
  • Kathleen M Griffiths1,
  • Helen Christensen1 and
  • Anthony F Jorm2
BMC Public Health20099:61

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-61

Received: 24 May 2008

Accepted: 20 February 2009

Published: 20 February 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 May 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andre Tylee
19 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Jorm
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Jorm
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-9-61

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University
(2)
ORYGEN Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne

Advertisement