Skip to main content

Table 3 Epidemiological studies from the UK – childhood injuries

From: A review of injury epidemiology in the UK and Europe: some methodological considerations in constructing rates

Author and date

Type of study/data source

Population

(denominator)/size

Level of severity

Epidemiological observation

Major findings

Epidemiological shortcomings

Roberts et al., 1996 [46]

descriptive study/Office for Population Censuses Surveys

children

(0–15 y)

England and Wales

deaths

rates by social class and cause; trends of mortality rates

1979–83 to 1989–92 Social class gradients in mortality: 21% and 2% decline in social classes IV and V (47.5 to 37.8/100,000 and 84.7 to 82.9/100,000); 32% and 37% decline in social classes I and II (24.2 to 16.5/100,000 and 25.0 to 15.8/100,000)

Data on death only; missing data for 1981

DiGuiseppi et al., 1997 [43]

descriptive study/Office for National Statistics

children

(0–14 y)

England and Wales

deaths

proportions and trends of rates per mile travelled by age, gender, type road user

Travel patterns responsible for (34%) decline in children rates 1985–1992; declines in walking/cycling activities (37% and 38% declines pedestrian/cyclist rates)

Data on deaths only, focused on road traffic injuries; no population based rates for all injuries

Edwards et al., 2006 [41]

descriptive study/Office for National Statistics

children

(0–15 y)

England and Wales

deaths

rates and proportions by socio-economic classes, year, 3 y average, cause

1979–2003 Decline in death rates (per 100,000) from 11.1 (1979,1980, 1982) to 4.0 (2001–2003). Socio-economic gradients e.g. 13.1 times higher all external causes injury rates NSSEC* class 8 vs.1

Data on deaths only; lack of 1980 injury deaths data

Lyons et al., 1995 [57]

descriptive study/West Glamorgan injury database

children

(0–14 y)/370000

West Glamorgan County, Wales

A&E

proportions by place; rates and correlation of distance to A&E, no car and Townsend with rate ratio

1993 18200 injuries/100,000

Association of overall and home injury with proximity to A&E unit; no association of injury with socioeconomic status

Fractures as a proxy indicator for severe injuries – Nuffield Hospital Classification 1 year study

Graham et al., 2004 [52]

descriptive (prospective) study/Crosshouse Hospital questionnaire data; Procurator Fiscal

children

(0–13 y)/10697

Kilmarnock, Scotland

deaths, hospitalization and A&E

proportions by type; rates of admissions by age

1999/2000 5.6 hospital admissions per day Information on local injury data and preventive measures in use (cycle helmets used in 26% of cycle incidents; adult supervision in 49% of incidents)

No population based rates, no information on severity; 12.9% response rate

MacInnes & Stone 2008 [54]

descriptive study/Royal Hospital Sick Children database

children (<7 y)

Glasgow, Scotland

A&E

proportions by age, gender, location, circumstances, cause, type of injury; rates by age, gender, location

1997–2001 14400/100,000 per year A&E attendance rate, peak values within 12–35 months; leading causes and types: 41% falls; 68% home location; 62% play related; 52% head injuries.

No information on severity; one geographical region only

Ness et al., 2002 [58]

descriptive survey/Glasgow Royal Infirmary

Questionnaire data

children (13 y)/1493 Glasgow, Scotland

A&E

proportions by age, postcode – deprivation (Carstair Depcat)

1990 injuries by type, location (facial laceration, radius/ulna fractures most frequently; 72% outside house); most of injured children come from highest area of deprivation

53%questionnaire response rate; selection 10% of the questionnaires for analysis; study period – 3 months

  1. * National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NSSEC) is a new, occupational based classification that replaced starting with 2001 the social classes. The analytic eight class version is described as follows: 1 higher managerial and professional occupations, 2 lower managerial and professional occupations, 3 intermediate occupations, 4 small employers and own account workers, 5 lower supervisory and technical occupations, 6 semi-routine occupations, 7 routine occupations, 8 never worked, long term unemployed [41]