Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community
© Mendoza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 02 August 2008
Accepted: 04 May 2009
Published: 04 May 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Aug 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Voss|
|15 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Greaney|
|28 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Ludbrook|
|18 Nov 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elmer Villanueva|
|3 Dec 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Jason Mendoza|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Dec 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Ludbrook|
|12 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Voss|
|12 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Greaney|
|27 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Jason Mendoza|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Ludbrook|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 May 2009||Editorially accepted|
|4 May 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-9-122|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.