Health information seeking on the Internet: a double divide? Results from a representative survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France, 2005–2006
© Renahy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 28 August 2007
Accepted: 21 February 2008
Published: 21 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Aug 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joshua Fogel|
|22 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Benotsch|
|29 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Dickerson|
|3 Dec 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Renahy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Dec 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joshua Fogel|
|11 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Benotsch|
|29 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Emilie Renahy|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-8-69|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.