Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of the safety, effectiveness and usefulness of vaccination as a function of perceived relative vulnerability and perceived control (N = 1763)

From: Parents' perceived vulnerability and perceived control in preventing Meningococcal C infection: a large-scale interview study about vaccination

 

Perceived relative vulnerability

Perceived control 1

 

All

Optimists 19.5%

Pessimists 19.7%

Realists 60.8%

Can't do anything 76.1%

Internal perceived control 8.2%

External perceived control 10.8%

Effectiveness (possibility to contract the infection after vaccination – % yes)

39

42

39

38

36a

45b

50b

Safety (side-effects of vaccination – % yes)

12

13

11

11

10a

19b

13a

Usefulness of vaccination

       

- Campaign reassuring1

1.5

1.4

1.2a

1.7b

1.5a

2.0b

1.7

- Campaign beneficial1

1.1

1.0

0.8a

1.2b

1.1a

1.8b

1.1a

- Campaign self-evident1

2.5

1.8a

2.0a

2.8b

2.3a

3.5b

2.9

  1. The VAS scale ranges from 1 (very reassuring/very beneficial/self-evident) to 10 (not reassuring/not beneficial/not self-evident). All variables in a row with different superscripts differ at p < .001
  2. 1 The percentages do not add up to 100%: 5% of the parents reported other reasons, these are excluded.