Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: a randomised controlled trial
© Gusi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 30 October 2007
Accepted: 08 July 2008
Published: 08 July 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Miranda Mugford|
|10 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Hill|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Narcis Gusi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jun 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Miranda Mugford|
|3 Jul 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Narcis Gusi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jul 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Jul 2008||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jul 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-8-231|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.