Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The 10/66 Dementia Research Group's fully operationalised DSM-IV dementia computerized diagnostic algorithm, compared with the 10/66 dementia algorithm and a clinician diagnosis: a population validation study

  • Martin J Prince1Email author,
  • Juan Llibre de Rodriguez2,
  • L Noriega3,
  • A Lopez4,
  • Daisy Acosta5,
  • Emiliano Albanese1,
  • Raul Arizaga6,
  • John RM Copeland7,
  • Michael Dewey1,
  • Cleusa P Ferri1,
  • Mariella Guerra8,
  • Yueqin Huang9,
  • KS Jacob10,
  • ES Krishnamoorthy11,
  • Paul McKeigue12,
  • Renata Sousa13,
  • Robert J Stewart14,
  • Aquiles Salas15,
  • Ana Luisa Sosa,
  • Richard Uwakwa and
  • the 10/66 Dementia research group
BMC Public Health20088:219

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-219

Received: 02 November 2007

Accepted: 24 June 2008

Published: 24 June 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Nov 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Slade
12 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan DE LEPELEIRE
24 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Martin Prince
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan DE LEPELEIRE
11 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Martin Prince
Resubmission - Version 4
11 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Martin Prince
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Jun 2008 Editorially accepted
24 Jun 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-8-219

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Section of Epidemiology, Health Services Research, King's College London
(2)
Facultad de Medicina Finley-Albarran, Medical University of Havana
(3)
University Policlinic "19 de Abril"
(4)
Community Mental Health Centre
(5)
Internal Medicine Department, Geriatric Section, Universidad Nacional Pedro Henriquez Ureña (UNPHU)
(6)
Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Unit, Neuraxis Institute – Neurological Foundation
(7)
University of Liverpool
(8)
Psychogeriatric Unit, Department 401. Corpac -SAN ISIDRO Lima, National Institute of Mental Health "Honorio Delgado Hideyo Noguchi"
(9)
Peking University, Institute of Mental Health.
(10)
Christian Medical College
(11)
Srinivasan Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, The Institute of Neurological Sciences, Voluntary Health Services
(12)
Public Health Sciences/Molecular Medicine Centre, MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh
(13)
Medicine Department, Caracas University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Central de Venezuela
(14)
The Cognition and Behavior Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Mexico
(15)
Dept. of Mental Health, Namdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital

Advertisement