Is it worth investing in mental health promotion and prevention of mental illness? A systematic review of the evidence from economic evaluations
© Zechmeister et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 01 June 2007
Accepted: 22 January 2008
Published: 22 January 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jun 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filip Smit|
|18 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Shiell|
|24 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eva Jane Llopis|
|27 Aug 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Reinhold Kilian|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Aug 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filip Smit|
|27 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eva Jane Llopis|
|26 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Reinhold Kilian|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Jan 2008||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jan 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-8-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.