Implications for registry-based vaccine effectiveness studies from an evaluation of an immunization registry: A cross-sectional study
© Mahon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 15 November 2007
Accepted: 14 May 2008
Published: 14 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Nov 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kim Rask|
|8 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steve Berman|
|2 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Mahon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steve Berman|
|30 Apr 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Mahon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Apr 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|14 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-8-160|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.