Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© Wu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 11 August 2006
Accepted: 11 December 2006
Published: 11 December 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serena Tonstad|
|30 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Lancaster|
|19 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serena Tonstad|
|2 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Critchley|
|5 Dec 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Dec 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Dec 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|10 Dec 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|11 Dec 2006||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-6-300|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.